Current Trends in Drug Testing

drug testing

Article overview: This article explains Current Trends in Drug Testing and the scientific, legal or practical evidence readers should understand.

Current drug-testing technologies and trends

Today’s Drug Testing Trends Despite the controversy around drug screening in current and future employees, drug testing is now extremely popular in larger companies. This is because it is a proven and cost-effective strategy which results in getting help to those who need it, lessens accidents and sick leave, improves attendance and increased safety and productivity. If this is the case one wonders why it is so controversial. The problem with these tests is that they constitute an infringement on the employees’ right to privacy and dignity and that the result of the drug test may not even be related to work performance. Companies must seek to strike the right balance between these two sets of interests and take into consideration state law, employee sentiment and other practical considerations. Discussed below are some of the current trends in this area of testing. Types of Drug Tests C. R. Wright discusses in his article the different types of testing used today. The oldest and most commonly used drug test is the urine test. It is safe, quick, easy to implement and inexpensive. However a growing problem is the ease with which these tests are cheated. Other tests include testing one’s saliva, hair or blood. Blood tests are typically only resorted to when employers have a strong suspicion of drug influence at the workplace which has resulted in some sort of accident. These tests are not only more invasive but also more expensive. Tests involving hair can determine drug use further back in time and are becoming more popular among employers. Saliva tests are also increasing in popularity due to their convenience. Frequency of Testing According to the staffing firm Automation, recent surveys focusing on drug testing in the staffing industry showed that 45% of agencies currently perform drug tests on every single recruit. 29% of these agencies test more than half their recruits while only 12% stated that they rarely perform drug tests. 14% reported that they test less than half their recruits. This indicates a significant reliance on drug testing in this industry. Whom to Test While some employers test only applicants, others test employees for drug use if there has been an accident at the workplace or if the employer has reasonable suspicion regarding a certain employee’s drug use. According to C.R. Wright, only a small percentage of employers subject their employees to periodic or random testing. Outside Factors The Institute for Behaviour and Health released an article in 2015 which considers the fact of the legalisation of marijuana in certain states on drug testing in the workplace. This development has resulted in a more relaxed stance towards drug testing. However the article maintains that companies should continue to enforce a zero tolerance approach to drugs, including marijuana, at the workplace, particularly in safety sensitive jobs. Cheating The art of cheating on these tests has become a hot topic on the internet, with people frequently advising each other on new ways to obtain a negative result. The three main ways according to an article by TestCountry are dilution, substitution and adulteration. Dilution is when the test taker consumes a large amount of liquid prior to the test in order to dilute his or her urine sample. Substitution entails the test taker switching his or her urine with a clean sample. Adulteration is done by adding a foreign substance to the urine sample such as bleach or vinegar, in order to make the sample unusable. The article further mentions ways in which one can reduce the risk or possibilities of cheating.
Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

Less Vomiting With CBD Did Not Mean Protection From THC’s Cognitive Effects in Primates

Adding CBD was associated with less first-day vomiting in a small adolescent-primate experiment, but did not prevent the measured THC-related learning disruption. Improvement in one adverse outcome should not be presented as general protection. Three small treatment groups Twelve male squirrel monkeys received vehicle, THC alone or THC with CBD,…

Spread the love

Read Article: Less Vomiting With CBD Did Not Mean Protection From THC’s Cognitive Effects in Primates

A Receptor Mutation Did Not Delay THC Tolerance in a Chemotherapy-Neuropathy Model

A cannabinoid-receptor mutation associated with altered tolerance in other experiments did not delay THC tolerance in mice with cisplatin-related neuropathy. The result shows why a mechanism demonstrated in one pain model may not transfer to another. A chronic pain model with two sexes Researchers studied wild-type mice and animals carrying…

Spread the love

Read Article: A Receptor Mutation Did Not Delay THC Tolerance in a Chemotherapy-Neuropathy Model

Mouse Cannabinoid Withdrawal Findings Depended on Timing and Agonist Efficacy

Behavior after cannabinoid cessation differed with the compound, dose and observation time in a mouse study. An early negative assessment could miss later changes, while a strong response to a synthetic agonist should not be relabeled as a THC result. Continuous observation added information Researchers compared repeated THC with AM2389,…

Spread the love

Read Article: Mouse Cannabinoid Withdrawal Findings Depended on Timing and Agonist Efficacy

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 363-3347 Contact Us