Speak with an expert today (424) 363-3347(For attorneys only)

California Ethics Opinion Says No to Law-Firm Parties; Judge Byrdsong Is Pictured Attending Them

Guests posing for photos at the Douglas Hicks 8th annual party hosted by Carl Douglas and Jamon Hicks

Article overview: California Formal Opinion 2023-024 says judges should not attend complimentary private law-firm celebrations because they create an appearance of special influence. This post presents photographs described as showing Judge Rupert Byrdsong at such events.

SEO structure updated July 24, 2026.

Primary Authority Cited

California Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Ethics, Formal Opinion 2023-024 (August 29, 2023)

Central Holdings:

  • Judicial officers may not accept invitations from for-profit law firms to attend anniversary celebrations at the firm’s offices with complimentary food and beverages
  • The answer to the inquiry question is definitively “No”

Key Reasoning (Page 6): The Committee concluded that attending such events may suggest a judicial officer has a special relationship or close association with the law firm, potentially causing observers to question the judge’s impartiality in cases involving that firm or suspect the firm has special influence over judicial decisions.

The supporting California Supreme Court formal opinion is below for reference.

The pictures are of Judge Rupert Byrdsong at parties of private firms.

So, this post has a picture from this year’s attendance of Judge Rupert Byrdsong attending a private firm party on Facebook, as he attends many private firm party on a regular basis.

Why the ethics rule matters

The formal opinion treats the appearance of special access as the problem. A judge does not need to announce bias before repeated attendance at private law-firm events raises a legitimate concern that a firm enjoys a privileged relationship with the court. The photographs and opinion belong in the same public record.

Review the related Judge Rupert Byrdsong archive.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

California Dual Employment: Working for a Competitor

California generally voids employee noncompete agreements, but that does not necessarily prevent an at-will employer from terminating a worker who simultaneously works for a competitor. The result depends on duties of loyalty, trade-secret conduct, contract terms and other statutory protections.

Spread the love

Read More

The Okorocha Mid-Year Street Drug Report of 2026

No credible dataset measures the quantity of illicit drugs actually sold in the United States at the state or national level. Seizures reflect enforcement activity, forensic identifications reflect laboratory submissions, and the only defensible national market-size estimate covers 2006–2016. The…

Spread the love

Read More

Medetomidine in the Fentanyl Supply: Risks and Testing

Short answer: Medetomidine is a veterinary sedative now appearing in parts of the illegal fentanyl supply. It can deepen sedation, slow the heart, lower blood pressure, complicate overdose care, and cause a severe withdrawal syndrome. It is not approved for human use. Reviewed and updated July 24, 2026. What is…

Spread the love

Read More

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 283-0029 Contact Us