California Ethics Opinion Says No to Law-Firm Parties; Judge Byrdsong Is Pictured Attending Them

Guests posing for photos at the Douglas Hicks 8th annual party hosted by Carl Douglas and Jamon Hicks

Article overview: California Formal Opinion 2023-024 says judges should not attend complimentary private law-firm celebrations because they create an appearance of special influence. This post presents photographs described as showing Judge Rupert Byrdsong at such events.

SEO structure updated July 24, 2026.

Primary Authority Cited

California Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Ethics, Formal Opinion 2023-024 (August 29, 2023)

Central Holdings:

  • Judicial officers may not accept invitations from for-profit law firms to attend anniversary celebrations at the firm’s offices with complimentary food and beverages
  • The answer to the inquiry question is definitively “No”

Key Reasoning (Page 6): The Committee concluded that attending such events may suggest a judicial officer has a special relationship or close association with the law firm, potentially causing observers to question the judge’s impartiality in cases involving that firm or suspect the firm has special influence over judicial decisions.

The supporting California Supreme Court formal opinion is below for reference.

The pictures are of Judge Rupert Byrdsong at parties of private firms.

So, this post has a picture from this year’s attendance of Judge Rupert Byrdsong attending a private firm party on Facebook, as he attends many private firm party on a regular basis.

Why the ethics rule matters

The formal opinion treats the appearance of special access as the problem. A judge does not need to announce bias before repeated attendance at private law-firm events raises a legitimate concern that a firm enjoys a privileged relationship with the court. The photographs and opinion belong in the same public record.

Review the related Judge Rupert Byrdsong archive.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

Judge Robert S. Draper’s Verified Answer in CJP Inquiry No. 212

Primary-source document: Judge Robert S. Draper’s verified answer to the California Commission on Judicial Performance’s Notice of Formal Proceedings in Inquiry No. 212. The answer was filed on February 4, 2026. In it, Judge Draper denies violating the judicial canons cited by the Commission, disputes the Commission’s characterization of several…

Spread the love

Read Article: Judge Robert S. Draper’s Verified Answer in CJP Inquiry No. 212

Age, Balance, and Field-Sobriety Evidence: What Population Research Can Show

Age-related balance research helps frame evidence review, but population averages do not diagnose impairment or establish why one person swayed.

Spread the love

Read Article: Age, Balance, and Field-Sobriety Evidence: What Population Research Can Show

Kratom Cardiac Arrest and the Limits of a Mitragynine Blood Level

A 500 µg/L mitragynine result in a survived cardiac arrest illustrates why concentration, treatment, specimen timing, and alternative causes matter.

Spread the love

Read Article: Kratom Cardiac Arrest and the Limits of a Mitragynine Blood Level

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 363-3347 Contact Us