Speak with an expert today (424) 363-3347(For attorneys only)

Judge Byrdsong takes the cases from the juries and picks the winner. It looks like he must get some benefit of some kind!

As discussed in a previous post, Judge Byrdsong makes sure the side he is rooting for wins, even when the case is not in his court, as discussed in previous posts. This includes helping his former firm get a $25 million verdict. Does he really do all of this and not get a piece of the action?

Here is another example of his antics:

Critically Harmful Interruptions During Closing Argument
At a crucial moment in Ms. Wells’ closing, the Court rebuked her for using the word “termination” to describe the harm Plaintiff suffered, claiming wrongly: “There’s no evidence of a termination. We used ‘reduction’ throughout[.] [¶] . . . [¶] But you’ve used it a couple of times. I think that’s improper.” (RT 7/25/23, 123:16-124:26; 124:27-125:7.) Yet, the Court “overruled” an objection to Plaintiff’s counsel’s use of the word “termination” during examination of Plaintiff the day before, stating “the jury understands.” (RT 7/24/23, 33:10-16.) It is undisputed Plaintiff was involuntarily removed from her job. (RT 7/11/23, 43:22-44:8.) The Court’s improper rebuke right when Ms. Wells was asking for damages seemed designed to inflict maximum harm.
Then, defense counsel chimed in to prevent Ms. Wells from recommending any amount for Plaintiff’s damages from the loss of her job. (RT 7/25/23, 125:16-18; see also RT 7/25/23, 124:27- 125:7.) Defense counsel cut off Ms. Wells, stating: “Your Honor, this is improper. You can’t have damages under multiple theories and compound them.” (RT 7/25/23, 125:16-18.) Yet, Ms. Wells argued Plaintiff was seeking emotional distress damages for two harms, i.e., hypertension and loss of her job, and that she could only recover once for each harm. (RT 7/25/23, 120:15-121:10, 123:6-10; see also 120:8-127:2.) Still, the Court “sustained” the objection. (RT 7/25/23, 125:16-19.)

Thank you LEILA AL FAIZ for standing strong against the Stasi [1].

[1] “Stasi” pronounced “Stazy” is the slang term for “Ministerium für Staatssicherheit” or “Staatssicherheit,” which was a governmental behemoth and the ruthless and despicable official state security service of the communist former East Germany. The Citizenry of East Germany, in response to Rampart-style antics of the Stasi, stormed the Stasi headquarters around the time of the Berlin wall collapse, and eliminated the Stasi.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

“Pink Cocaine” Isn’t Cocaine & is Dangerous

Pink Cocaine Isn’t Cocaine — The Dark Reality of “Tusi” Forensic Toxicology · Public Health Pink CocaineIsn’t Cocaine A candy-colored powder is sweeping nightlife from Bogotá to New York. Almost nothing about it is what the name promises. By The Desk Long read · 7 min Updated 2026 A pink,…

Spread the love

Read More

Ninth Circuit Rulings Cause Open-Carry Law Confusion

Open Carry in California: Why the Headlines Outran the Law The Okorocha Firm Notes on California Law Second Amendment · Status Update Open Carry in California: Why the Headlines Outran the Law A Ninth Circuit panel struck down the urban open-carry ban in January. The full court has since voted…

Spread the love

Read More

California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act Decision

Half a Loaf for California’s Kids-Online Law The Okorocha Firm Notes on California Law Technology · Children Online Half a Loaf for California’s Kids-Online Law On its second look at the Age-Appropriate Design Code, the Ninth Circuit put the age-estimation rule back in play while keeping the data-use and “dark…

Spread the love

Read More

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 283-0029 Contact Us