Speak with an expert today (424) 363-3347(For attorneys only)

Judge Byrdsong takes the cases from the juries and picks the winner. It looks like he must get some benefit of some kind!

As discussed in a previous post, Judge Byrdsong makes sure the side he is rooting for wins, even when the case is not in his court, as discussed in previous posts. This includes helping his former firm get a $25 million verdict. Does he really do all of this and not get a piece of the action?

Here is another example of his antics:

Critically Harmful Interruptions During Closing Argument
At a crucial moment in Ms. Wells’ closing, the Court rebuked her for using the word “termination” to describe the harm Plaintiff suffered, claiming wrongly: “There’s no evidence of a termination. We used ‘reduction’ throughout[.] [¶] . . . [¶] But you’ve used it a couple of times. I think that’s improper.” (RT 7/25/23, 123:16-124:26; 124:27-125:7.) Yet, the Court “overruled” an objection to Plaintiff’s counsel’s use of the word “termination” during examination of Plaintiff the day before, stating “the jury understands.” (RT 7/24/23, 33:10-16.) It is undisputed Plaintiff was involuntarily removed from her job. (RT 7/11/23, 43:22-44:8.) The Court’s improper rebuke right when Ms. Wells was asking for damages seemed designed to inflict maximum harm.
Then, defense counsel chimed in to prevent Ms. Wells from recommending any amount for Plaintiff’s damages from the loss of her job. (RT 7/25/23, 125:16-18; see also RT 7/25/23, 124:27- 125:7.) Defense counsel cut off Ms. Wells, stating: “Your Honor, this is improper. You can’t have damages under multiple theories and compound them.” (RT 7/25/23, 125:16-18.) Yet, Ms. Wells argued Plaintiff was seeking emotional distress damages for two harms, i.e., hypertension and loss of her job, and that she could only recover once for each harm. (RT 7/25/23, 120:15-121:10, 123:6-10; see also 120:8-127:2.) Still, the Court “sustained” the objection. (RT 7/25/23, 125:16-19.)

Thank you LEILA AL FAIZ for standing strong against the Stasi [1].

[1] “Stasi” pronounced “Stazy” is the slang term for “Ministerium für Staatssicherheit” or “Staatssicherheit,” which was a governmental behemoth and the ruthless and despicable official state security service of the communist former East Germany. The Citizenry of East Germany, in response to Rampart-style antics of the Stasi, stormed the Stasi headquarters around the time of the Berlin wall collapse, and eliminated the Stasi.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

Suboxone Causes Tooth Decay

Suboxone and Tooth Decay: What the FDA Warning and the Science Actually Say Forensic Toxicology Review The Okorocha Firm pH 7.0 5.5 acidic oral surface The Film That Dissolves on Your Teeth Buprenorphine saves lives in opioid use disorder. The way it is delivered, dissolved against the teeth twice a…

Spread the love

Read More

GLP-1’s Extremely Rare Side-Effects

One Drug, Three Injuries: GLP-1 Agonists, the Stomach, the Pregnancy, and the Optic Nerve Forensic Notebook The Okorocha Firm One Drug, Three Injuries: GLP-1 Agonists and the Causation Question The same slowed-stomach pharmacology that makes semaglutide and tirzepatide work is now at the center of three separate injury theories: stomach…

Spread the love

Read More

Depo Provera & Intracranial Meningiomas

The Needle and the Meninges: Depo-Provera and the Rising Science of Intracranial Meningioma The Okorocha Firm Law + Science = Forensics Forensic Toxicology & Pharmacology The Needle and the Meninges A quarterly injection met an ordinary brain tumor, and the collision is now reshaping pharmacovigilance, product labeling, and the science of causation in court….

Spread the love

Read More

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 283-0029 Contact Us