Speak with an expert today (424) 363-3347(For attorneys only)

Alcohol and the Workplace

alcohol testing

The Role of Alcohol Testing in the Workplace Today

Since the introduction of the Federal Drug-Free Workplace Program in the late 1980s, drug and alcohol testing in the workplace has become a common phenomenon. Most companies implement at least some form of testing, whether it be to screen prospective employees or to conduct alcohol tests on staff at random. The drug and alcohol testing industry now makes billions of dollars annually, and provides an important service to employers, although it is not without its controversies. It is therefore vital for employers to make sure that they are fully aware of what testing involves.

Alcoholism and the workplace
Occupational alcoholism is a widespread problem. It has recently been reported that 6.6% of American employees working full-time jobs admit to frequent and heavy alcohol consumption. The implications of alcohol abuse for companies and the economy as a whole are serious. Impact includes decreased productivity, poor employee performance and behavior, increased rates of absenteeism, fatalities from workplace accidents caused by intoxication, work-related injuries, and higher levels of employee discipline and dismissal.

What role can alcohol testing play?
Although many studies attempt to make the argument that there is a correlation between testing and a reduction in occupational accidents, such a relationship has not been conclusively proven. Nevertheless, introducing alcohol testing – particularly post-accident testing and random testing – can play an important role in deterring employees from consuming alcohol whilst on the job.

Is testing in the workplace lawful?
Alcohol testing in the workplace is generally regarded as lawful if it is conducted fairly and reliably. The way in which the test was carried out, the testing conditions, whether the results were analysed by a professional forensic toxicologist, and the reasons for the testing of the employee are all important factors, should a testing be scrutinized in court.

What types of testing are available?
The most common testing methods available are breath testing, urine testing and blood alcohol level testing.

  • Breath testing
    Breath testing requires an employee to blow into an intoxylizer machine (commonly known as a Breathalyser) twice over a period of two minutes. The machine produces a momentary estimate of the employee’s blood alcohol level. A trained Breath Alcohol Technician must conduct the test. Although this is a common form of testing, it does not provide an exact measure of the blood alcohol level and there is a risk of inaccuracy. For example, the presence of alcohol in the mouth can produce false high readings. The advantage of this form of test is that it is not invasive and produces relatively instant results.
  • Urine testing
    Urine testing is conducted by requesting employees to provide a urine sample which can then be tested in a lab by a forensic toxicologist. This test is often used to confirm breath tests, or is used as an alternative. Although it is slightly more invasive, it is also more accurate. Usually two urine samples are needed, produced 20-30 minutes apart.
  • Blood testing
    A blood test measures the exact level of alcohol in the employee’s blood. Once the blood has been drawn, it is analysed by a forensic toxicologist in a laboratory, and can be re-tested at a later stage if necessary. The advantage of blood testing is accuracy; however, it is much more invasive form of test and is not likely to be used frequently.

Post-testing options
If an employee tests positive, employers must decide whether to dismiss or rehabilitate the employee. This will depend on the circumstances of the case. Establishing Employee Assistance Programs to provide counselling, assessment and referral services is a valuable way to supplement testing procedures and support employees.

Spread the love

The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Recent Blog Articles

Riverside Cross-Examination of Okorie Okorocha

Judge: Thank you. Back on the record matter. Sir, you are still under oath. Okorie Okorocha: Yes, your honor. Judge: Ms. McCauley cross-examination? Prosecutor Ms. McCauley: Yes, your honor. Good afternoon, Mr. Okorocha. Expert Witness Okorie Okorocha: Good afternoon. Am I saying that correctly? Expert Witness Okorie Okorocha: Yes, you…

Spread the love

Read More

Simpson Rips Jones

Publishing Original Scientific Research In 1997, Dr. Simpson was searching the scientific literature on alcohol and discovered several irregularities in work by AW Jones. An article published by Jones and Neri [1] in 1991 stated that the experimental work was reported in an earlier article published by Kelly, Myrsten, Neri,…

Spread the love

Read More

Malibu Sniper Sentenced 119 Years for Killing Camping Father in Front of Kids  

Congratulations to Nick Okorocha for his success in obtaining many acquittals in an impossible trial. Spread the love

Spread the love

Read More

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 283-0029 Contact Us