Filed Declarations Accuse Judge Rupert Byrdsong of Harassment, Interference and Retaliation

Word cloud centered on cronyism, surrounded by related terms including government, authority, friends, qualifications, favoritism, and meritocracy

Article overview: Filed declarations and exhibits accuse Judge Rupert Byrdsong of harassment, interference and retaliation against attorneys and litigants. This post presents the accusations and identifies the source materials behind them.

SEO structure updated July 24, 2026.

in Esperanza Perez v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, et al., whereby Paller’s firm Gilbert Sackman represented the union in which the undersigned represented the plaintiff; Exhibit 5: Supplemental Declaration of Twila S. White in Support of Motions to Compel Compliance with Subpoenas to USW Local 7600 and UNAC/UHP, dated July 19, 2024, in Esperanza Perez v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, et al., whereby Paller’s firm Gilbert Sackman represented the union in which the undersigned represented the plaintiff; Exhibit 6: List of the Los Angeles County Bar Association Labor and Employment Law Section Executive Committee Roster which includes Paller. He served on that committee along with Judge who has a history of interfering/harassing Ms. White and other attornreys.

Exhibit 7: Cases that Ms. White handled which Byrdsong has interfered with, including Jane Doe, et. Al. v. Wal- Mart Associates, Inc. (Case No. B323435) and Julius Janisse v. Martin Luther King, Jr., et. al.(Case No. 19STCV27233 ); Exhibit 8: Filings in matters in which Byrdsong has also been accused of interfering with, including Bassett Unified School District v. Michael Ross (Case No. B323528) and Carlton Costigan v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, et. al. (Case No. 20STCV18816), especially paragraphs 10, 19 through 23, and 34 through 40 of the Declaration of Nancy Anfanger dated December 2, 2024 and filed on December 2, 2024.

Why harassment and interference cannot be normalized

The filed declarations accuse Judge Rupert Byrdsong of harassment, interference and retaliation. Conduct of that kind, if established by the record, is not tough judging; it is an abuse of judicial power that can distort advocacy and punish people for challenging the court.

Continue with the Judge Rupert Byrdsong source archive.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

In-Custody Deaths, Toxicology, and the End of Excited Delirium in California

California bars excited delirium as a diagnosis and civil evidence. Learn what AB 360 means for in-custody death toxicology and section 1983 causation.

Spread the love

Read More

Vehicle Code Section 21221: What Actually Applies to a Motorized Scooter Rider

California Vehicle Code section 21221 applies driver rules to scooter riders, while section 21221.5 creates a separate $250 under-the-influence offense.

Spread the love

Read More

An E-Bike Is Not a Motor Vehicle: Beale v. DMV Bars Refusal Suspensions

Beale v. DMV held that California cannot suspend a driver’s license for chemical-test refusal arising from an electric-bicycle ride. Analysis of the ruling, controlling statutes, limits, and defense strategy.

Spread the love

Read More

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 363-3347 Contact Us