Filed Declarations Accuse Judge Rupert Byrdsong of Harassment, Interference and Retaliation

Word cloud centered on cronyism, surrounded by related terms including government, authority, friends, qualifications, favoritism, and meritocracy

Article overview: Filed declarations and exhibits accuse Judge Rupert Byrdsong of harassment, interference and retaliation against attorneys and litigants. This post presents the accusations and identifies the source materials behind them.

SEO structure updated July 24, 2026.

in Esperanza Perez v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, et al., whereby Paller’s firm Gilbert Sackman represented the union in which the undersigned represented the plaintiff; Exhibit 5: Supplemental Declaration of Twila S. White in Support of Motions to Compel Compliance with Subpoenas to USW Local 7600 and UNAC/UHP, dated July 19, 2024, in Esperanza Perez v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, et al., whereby Paller’s firm Gilbert Sackman represented the union in which the undersigned represented the plaintiff; Exhibit 6: List of the Los Angeles County Bar Association Labor and Employment Law Section Executive Committee Roster which includes Paller. He served on that committee along with Judge who has a history of interfering/harassing Ms. White and other attornreys.

Exhibit 7: Cases that Ms. White handled which Byrdsong has interfered with, including Jane Doe, et. Al. v. Wal- Mart Associates, Inc. (Case No. B323435) and Julius Janisse v. Martin Luther King, Jr., et. al.(Case No. 19STCV27233 ); Exhibit 8: Filings in matters in which Byrdsong has also been accused of interfering with, including Bassett Unified School District v. Michael Ross (Case No. B323528) and Carlton Costigan v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, et. al. (Case No. 20STCV18816), especially paragraphs 10, 19 through 23, and 34 through 40 of the Declaration of Nancy Anfanger dated December 2, 2024 and filed on December 2, 2024.

Why harassment and interference cannot be normalized

The filed declarations accuse Judge Rupert Byrdsong of harassment, interference and retaliation. Conduct of that kind, if established by the record, is not tough judging; it is an abuse of judicial power that can distort advocacy and punish people for challenging the court.

Continue with the Judge Rupert Byrdsong source archive.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

Nail Drug Testing in Court: Records and Scientific Limits

Learn what nail drug testing may show, why contamination and timing matter, and which laboratory records lawyers should request before interpreting a result.

Spread the love

Read More

Breath-to-Blood Conversion: Scientific Limits and Records

A breath-alcohol instrument measures alcohol in a breath sample. It does not draw or analyze blood. When a breath result is discussed as though it were a blood-alcohol concentration, a conversion assumption connects two different biological measurements. That distinction is not merely semantic. It affects how a result should be…

Spread the love

Read More

Breath-Test Records Needed for Scientific Review

A breath-test ticket is only the summary. Learn which instrument, calibration, reference-material, operator, sequence, and audit records support scientific review.

Spread the love

Read More

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 363-3347 Contact Us