Speak with an expert today (424) 363-3347(For attorneys only)

The Legalities of Hospital Blood Testing

hospital blood testing

The legalities behind hospital blood testing have crept their way into the media several times. When a patient arrives at the hospital, there are certain conditions that need to be met in order for their blood to be tested. These conditions may vary from state to state.

In many instances, blood tests are required to be taken for a DUI case. According to Title 17 in California Law, these tests need to be conducted in a hospital environment.

A Recent Case Study of Hospital Blood Testing

Last year, a nurse was arrested in Utah after refusing to allow an officer to take a patient’s blood without a warrant. Body cam footage revealed University Hospital nurse, Alex Wubbels, refused the police officer permission to draw blood from a vehicle accident victim. She did so in a calm manner and explained that, under hospital policy, the blood sample could not be taken as the unconscious victim had neither given consent, nor been arrested.

The cop’s response was to aggressively pull Alex outside and arrest her, placing her in handcuffs. Although detained in a police vehicle for 20 minutes, charges were never filed against Alex. As a result of the incident, the offending officer, Salt Lake City Detective Jeff Payne, was fired from his post. Another officer involved in the incident was demoted.

The video of the incident exploded on the internet, raising everyone’s awareness of the legalities surrounding blood testing and consent.

The Law in California

Law in California is clear with regards to blood testing and the granting of consent. Below are a few points that you should know – especially regarding the instance of a DUI.

Title 17 in California law insists that all DUI blood tests are conducted by a trained medic in a hospital environment, along with other stipulations on how the government is to conduct such tests.

  1. The Fourth Amendment

    All American citizens are protected under the Fourth Amendment from any unlawful searches and seizures. A warrant needs to be produced for the above and may only be granted upon probable cause.

  2. Vehicle Code 13384 – California’s “Implied Consent Law”

    If you have a California driving license you have already given consent to the testing of substances if caught drunk driving.

    All drivers with a state-issued license are required to submit to written consent to the testing of drug or alcohol if found under lawful arrest for driving under the influence. This can be done via chemical, blood, breath or urine testing. This is known as California’s “implied consent law”.

    The Fourth Amendment does slightly influence this law. The Fourth Amendment becomes violated when no warrant is presented when attempting to draw blood from a DUI suspect. There are legal repercussions for refusing to submit – such as the possibility of a fine, imprisonment and the suspension of license.

    Although California follows the law of “implied consent”, recent Supreme Court rulings may judge the repercussions for refusing to submit as unconstitutional.

  3. The Choice Between a Blood Test or a Breath Test

    Any driver arrested for driving under the influence has the choice of a blood test or a breath test. It is the responsibility of the police to communicate this choice to the driver. If neither a blood nor a breath test is available, a urine test may be used.

    If the police officer suspects that the driver is under the influence of not only alcohol but drugs as well, and the driver chooses a breath test, a blood sample may be requested to test for the presence of drugs.

  4. Exceptions

    There are very few exceptions to California’s “implied consent laws” regarding owning a driving license. In fact, even if a person is dead or unconscious, they are still considered to not have withdrawn their consent. People who experience heart conditions and other blood conditions, such as hemophilia, are exceptions to blood testing. In this instance, the individual is required to submit a urine test.

  5. Police Communication

    The officer conducting the arrest carries the responsibility to communicate that the individual under arrest is not entitled to an attorney before certain procedures are carried out. These procedures include stating whether they will submit to a drug test, determining which test they will take, and during the administration of the test.

Blood testing is highly valuable in forensic toxicology as evidence in the court of law. Understanding your rights as a citizen in California is your responsibility. Your own biological samples could be your greatest witness.

Spread the love

Lawyers of Distinction USFCR Verified Vendor

Recent Blog Articles

The Trouble With Police Field Drug Test Kits

Police use a variety of “quick and reliable” drug tests that can easily be administered. But while they definitely are quick, they are not the most reliable. Despite concerns about inaccuracies, police field drug test kits are still used on a daily basis and contribute to false convictions. Unlike the…

Spread the love

Read More

Looking For A Toxicology Co-Counsel?

Choosing the right counsel for your court case can be a difficult decision to make, and it involves careful deliberation to make sure you have the right assistance by your side. Your case may involve toxins, poisons, narcotics, or other chemical substances that complicate court proceedings, and you may want…

Spread the love

Read More

The Challenges Of Hair Follicle Testing

Hair follicle testing has risen in use to over 200,000 drug tests per year in the U.S. This type of drug testing analyzes the hair shaft for drug metabolites, as opposed to analyzing bodily fluids such as urine or saliva which are used in most other types of drug testing….

Spread the love

Read More

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (800) 285-1763 Contact Us