Speak with an expert today (424) 363-3347(For attorneys only)

Defining the Role of a Forensic Lawyer

Forensic Lawyer

Forensic lawyers are experts in both law and forensic science. The intersection of science and law has allowed for new tools and methodologies for discovering truth. Okorie Okorocha has served as an expert witness in over 280 trials. His role is to help juries understand complex, scientific concepts and to explain the findings or conclusions.

Defining a Forensic Lawyer

Being experts in both law and forensic science, forensic lawyers use their knowledge of both fields to draw conclusions and bring support to court cases. Forensic evidence consists of all physical objects that can be observed by the five human senses. This could include substances, chemicals, tissue traces or impressions. Certain evidence found at crime scenes, such a finger prints or hair follicles, are invisible to the naked eye. It is only after tests are performed by forensic scientists, that previously insignificant evidence becomes crucial to a case. Once analyzed, this evidence can assist the investigators in the reconstruction of the sequence of events that took place at the crime scene. While general lawyers need to consult forensic scientists, forensic lawyers are able to personally study samples and other evidence found at crime scenes.

  • Job Description
    Having qualifications in both fields, the forensic lawyer is able to study evidence found at the crime scene – scientific principles and technology are applied to this evidence to obtain proof that can stand in court and assist in building a case. A lot of time is spent researching where the forensic lawyer gathers information, makes deductions and analyses samples. Evidence is studied in a laboratory or crime lab setting, while discussions of their findings can be done in settings varying from a legal office to the home of the client.
  • Skills and Qualifications
    Similar to any occupation, a forensic lawyer must meet certain requirements. Their list of requirements is however longer than most, as they have to cover the bases of two separate job descriptions, in one. Below are some of the necessary skills and qualifications of a successful forensic lawyer:

    • A four-year bachelor’s degree, a three-year law degree and the successful completion of a written bar examination.
    • Strong oral and written communication skills in order to persuade a jury.
    • Precision and attention to detail.
    • The ability to analyze and solve problems.
    • The ability to remain professional and analytical in unpleasant situations, such as the viewing of a dead body.
    • Extensive computer skills are necessary for the analysis of evidence.
    • Knowledge of medicine or law enforcement can serve as beneficial.

Having two masters’ degrees, one in toxicology and another in pharmacology, Okorie Okorocha has testified in court on many cases. As mentioned above, an expert witness is not always necessary but can be extremely beneficial to a case. Their job is to establish the authenticity of the toxicology report, chain of custody and validity of the test results. Using his knowledge in these fields, Okorie Okorocha helps the jury to understand the results of tests conducted and forensic evidence found. He then provides the court with his expert opinion on the findings.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

In criminal trials, both the defense and prosecution are entitled to an investigator counsel table.

California Penal Code 867 While a witness is under examination, the magistrate shall, upon motion of either party, exclude all potential and actual witness who have not been examined. The magistrate shall also order the witnesses not to converse with each other until they are all examined. The magistrate may…

Spread the love

Read More

Field Sobriety Test statistics cannot be used as evidence to convict. This applies to all statistics!

Field Sobriety Test statistics and other statistics/averages/ranges for the hypothetical generality of the populace, as distinguished from matters provable as to the individual defendant, infect the record with a fatal error.In People v. Wilson (2019) 33 Cal.App.5th 559 it was held that it was error to admit statistical-likelihood evidence to…

Spread the love

Read More

California Supreme Court: Judges should not attend law firm parties. Someone let Judge Rupert Byrdsong know.

Primary Authority Cited California Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Ethics, Formal Opinion 2023-024 (August 29, 2023) Central Holdings: Key Reasoning (Page 6): The Committee concluded that attending such events may suggest a judicial officer has a special relationship or close association with the law firm, potentially causing observers to question…

Spread the love

Read More

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 283-0029 Contact Us