Speak with an expert today (424) 363-3347(For attorneys only)

Medical Marijuana in the Workplace

forensic lawyer

Use a Forensic Lawyer to Tighten Up Your Drug Policies

Medical Marijuana
Medical marijuana is a relatively recent twist that employers now have to accommodate into their drug policy. With 17 states already having some form of medical marijuana implemented, forensic lawyers have been seeing an increase in employer-employee disputes over the legality of using medical marijuana in the workplace or even at home.

Marijuana has been shown to help with a few chronic and terminal illnesses, this has led to its legalization in a few states as a medical product. Yet on the federal level it is still classed as an illegal substance and this discrepancy is the cause of many problems in enforcing a correct drug policy.
Though not the main point of this article, a few of the states that have legalized medical marijuana, have also legalized recreational marijuana which also has its regulatory difficulties.

Federal Contracts
One of the biggest problems with medical marijuana is the fact that the state and federal laws may not agree on its legality. So it may be legal and accepted by the state, but any federal agency will disagree. For companies that only function on an intra-state level, this is not that big of a problem and can be handled quite easily. Yet the problem arises when your company handles federal contracts. Federal contracts are governed under the Drug Free Workplace Act, which requires a zero-tolerance approach towards illegal substances in the workplace and since marijuana is illegal on a federal level, medical marijuana cannot be exempted from this law.

It is important that if your company does work with federal contracts, that you comply with all federal laws and that the zero tolerance policy is clearly communicated to workers to ensure full understanding. Lack of implementation or correct communication can open you up to litigation and fines.

Testing Policies
For companies that don’t work on federal contracts, medical marijuana can be handled with more specific rules. A large concern of marijuana in the work place is whether or not it affects the user’s ability to perform the task at hand. Also whether or not the employee is working with sensitive or dangerous equipment which may hurt them or others if misused.

To handle these problems, it is advised that a company’s drug policy takes into account medical marijuana users, such as allowing its use for employees who aren’t using sensitive equipment and have proof of a condition requiring that they use marijuana. Not allowing employees with desk jobs to use their medication can become risky, because many have chronic or terminal illnesses which can qualify them for disability and refusing them their medication can be seen as discrimination.

Way Forward
As more and more states are legalizing medical marijuana, and some even recreational marijuana, the problem of marijuana in the workplace is going to become a national issue. If your state has already legalized or they are in the process of, it will be wise to speak to a forensic lawyer so that your companies drug policy can evolve to incorporate these new laws and find solutions that benefit both you and your employees.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

In criminal trials, both the defense and prosecution are entitled to an investigator counsel table.

California Penal Code 867 While a witness is under examination, the magistrate shall, upon motion of either party, exclude all potential and actual witness who have not been examined. The magistrate shall also order the witnesses not to converse with each other until they are all examined. The magistrate may…

Spread the love

Read More

Field Sobriety Test statistics cannot be used as evidence to convict. This applies to all statistics!

Field Sobriety Test statistics and other statistics/averages/ranges for the hypothetical generality of the populace, as distinguished from matters provable as to the individual defendant, infect the record with a fatal error.In People v. Wilson (2019) 33 Cal.App.5th 559 it was held that it was error to admit statistical-likelihood evidence to…

Spread the love

Read More

California Supreme Court: Judges should not attend law firm parties. Someone let Judge Rupert Byrdsong know.

Primary Authority Cited California Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Ethics, Formal Opinion 2023-024 (August 29, 2023) Central Holdings: Key Reasoning (Page 6): The Committee concluded that attending such events may suggest a judicial officer has a special relationship or close association with the law firm, potentially causing observers to question…

Spread the love

Read More

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 283-0029 Contact Us