Speak with an expert today (424) 363-3347(For attorneys only)

Dram Shop Law in Alaska

dram shop

Alaska’s Dram Shop Laws

In my previous post, I explained the basic tenets of dram shop laws. In the next series of articles, I’ll be looking at dram shop laws for specific states.

Recap: What is dram shop law?
Dram shop laws can essentially hold third party licensed alcohol providers – like bars, taverns, and other hospitality businesses – legally liable for injuries caused by drunken customers.

Typically, the bar is only accountable if it can be proved that they continued to serve alcohol to an already-intoxicated patron, or if they served alcohol to an underage patron. However, the extent and application of dram shop laws varies from state to state.

The purpose of dram shop laws is to encourage licensed alcohol providers to take some responsibility for ensuring the safety of others, by not allowing patrons to become incredibly intoxicated – thereby risking damage to themselves or others through reckless behavior.

Dram Shop Law in Alaska
Interestingly enough, Alaska’s dram shop laws actually protect third party licensed providers from civil liability if a drunk patron causes injury to others, except for two conditions:

  • If the establishment provides alcohol to a patron under the age of 21, unless that patron provides identification indicating that they are of legal drinking age (i.e. they use a fake ID).
  • If the establishment provides alcohol to a patron who is already clearly intoxicated.

More often than not, drinking establishments in Alaska find themselves in trouble for the second exception. If a third party provider contravenes this exception, they can be held responsible for “criminal negligence”. In this case, criminal negligence assumes that, while the establishment has not necessarily acted with malicious intent, they should have nonetheless anticipated the possible consequences of serving alcohol to an already-drunk patron. It assumes that a reasonable person (or in this case establishment) would have the foresight to see how their actions could have larger ramifications.

However, if a plaintiff – for instance, someone injured by a drunk driver – brings a dram shop case to court in Alaska, they must be able to prove that the patron was already drunk when the establishment served them alcohol. The plaintiff and their attorney must show that the patron was already mentally or physically impaired and displaying signs of this impairment when they were served alcohol. This kind of evidence may take the form of video footage from inside the establishment, or eye witness accounts.

It’s also interesting to note that Alaska’s dram shop laws do not cover damages caused by someone who was drinking at a private party (not a licensed provider of alcohol). This is actually covered set of laws, known as “social host liability”.

Alaska also does not allow someone to claim civil liability against an establishment if they were intoxicated and caused harm to themselves. So, if a drunk patron drives into a tree and injures themselves, they cannot sue the establishment.

You can find the full text of Alaska’s dram shop laws in “Alaska Statutes – Section 04.21.020” (covering the civil liability of licensed alcohol providers) and “Alaska Statutes – Section 04.21.030” (which covers prohibitions against serving alcohol to intoxicated persons).

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

The Real Truth About Dr. Vina Spiehler

The truth about Vina Spiehler, Ph.D by OKORIE OKOROCHA, M.S., M.S., ESQ. I first encountered her in Stockton, California, in which 2 motorcycle riders were severely injured, including brain damage. She blatantly lied about the toxicology, and the attorney doing her direct exam was beating a dead horse, but I…

Spread the love

Read More

More Reason to Never Trust Edmund “Ed” Barley

The Los Angeles Superior Courts have a panel of experts that they try to force appointed attorneys (including public defenders) to use. Getting on the panel is easy if you worked as a lab tech in a government crime lab as Ed Barley did, even if you have zero formal…

Spread the love

Read More

Never Trust Ed Barley

Joseph Younes & Olivier Tallieu snag a $5.7 million win for a deserving client in a very tough case in San Diego Federal Court. The case came down to the toxicological evidence. The Plaintiff’s attorneys with good sense chose Okorie Okorocha, M.S., M.S., ESQ., who has actual formal education in…

Spread the love

Read More

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 283-0029 Contact Us