CBD Benefit Within a Clobazam Subgroup Did Not Prove a Superior Combination

CBD reduced seizures among trial participants already taking clobazam, but this does not prove that the combination outperforms CBD without clobazam. CBD treatment was randomized; pre-existing clobazam use was not.

An original reanalysis of four trials

The report reanalyzed four randomized trials involving Lennox–Gastaut or Dravet syndrome. Participants received highly purified oral CBD at 10 or 20 mg/kg/day, or placebo, during fourteen weeks of treatment. The pooled efficacy populations included 396 participants with Lennox–Gastaut syndrome and 318 with Dravet syndrome.

Approximately 49% of the Lennox–Gastaut group and 64% of the Dravet group were taking clobazam. The primary seizure endpoint differed by syndrome: drop seizures for Lennox–Gastaut and convulsive seizures for Dravet. Those outcomes should not be combined into an undifferentiated claim about all seizures.

Within-subgroup efficacy was demonstrated

For Lennox–Gastaut participants taking clobazam, the pooled CBD-versus-placebo treatment ratio for drop-seizure frequency was 0.56, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.47–0.67. The overall Lennox–Gastaut ratio was 0.70, with a confidence interval of 0.62–0.80. Both comparisons favored CBD.

Those ratios describe modeled relative seizure-frequency effects against placebo in the specified analyses. They are not percentages of patients cured, seizure-freedom rates or a direct randomized comparison of combination therapy against CBD without clobazam.

Why the apparently larger subgroup effect needs caution

People taking clobazam could differ from those not taking it in disease characteristics, treatment history and previous response. Some off-clobazam patients may have tried and stopped it. Trials were not designed around the subgroup comparison, and clobazam doses could be adjusted for adverse effects.

The reanalysis also did not fully account for the many other concomitant treatments. It supports CBD efficacy within the studied subgroup while leaving the optimal-combination question less certain. These are further analyses of existing trial participants, not four additional independent experiments beyond the original trials. Seizure endpoints also do not validate driving ability or generalize to unstandardized retail cannabis products.

Related: CBD, clobazam and its active metabolite.

Primary research

Cannabidiol in conjunction with clobazam: analysis of four randomized controlled trials. DOI: 10.1111/ane.13351.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

Synthetic Sweat Recovery Does Not Prove Cannabis Collection Pads Are Interchangeable in People

Similar recovery of an added cannabis metabolite from collection materials does not establish that those materials perform interchangeably when sampling people. A 2023 study compared DrugWipe5A pads, cosmetic pads and cotton swabs using fortified synthetic sweat. Its results concern laboratory extraction and measurement, with an important gap before clinical or…

Spread the love

Read Article: Synthetic Sweat Recovery Does Not Prove Cannabis Collection Pads Are Interchangeable in People

A Cannabis Trial’s Smoking-Procedure Change Was Not a Randomized Safety Comparison

A cannabis driving trial reported fewer adverse events after switching from paced smoking to smoking to a desired effect. That observation does not establish the size of a causal safety benefit. The trial randomized cannabis-potency conditions; the smoking procedure changed during the study because the initial procedure was poorly tolerated….

Spread the love

Read Article: A Cannabis Trial’s Smoking-Procedure Change Was Not a Randomized Safety Comparison

THC Measured Per Forehead Sweat Pad Cannot Be Converted Into a Blood Concentration

A result expressed as nanograms of THC per sweat pad measures the amount recovered from that pad. It does not provide a blood concentration. A study involving drivers investigated in Italy illustrates why collection units, confirmation and participant selection must remain visible when interpreting forehead-sweat evidence. The collection sampled the…

Spread the love

Read Article: THC Measured Per Forehead Sweat Pad Cannot Be Converted Into a Blood Concentration

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 363-3347 Contact Us