A Ten-Day Glucuronide Stability Check Did Not Establish Unlimited Dried-Spot Stability

The dried-spot researchers found no observed cleavage of spiked THC-COOH glucuronide in their short stability check. That narrow result should retain its preparation and duration.

The experiment addressed a specific artifact

Reference material was added to blank blood at two concentrations, and the investigators examined the preparation directly after drying and after ten days of storage. The question was whether cleavage of the conjugate could contribute to measured unconjugated THC-COOH under those conditions.

A null cleavage finding has boundaries

The observation did not test every storage temperature, transport environment, collection card or duration. It also did not establish complete stability of parent THC, every metabolite or every biological component in an authentic specimen. Different stability questions require their own measurements.

Keep sample handling attached to the result

This check adds evidence about one potential source of analytical change. It does not guarantee that a specimen left under different conditions will retain the same concentrations indefinitely. A forensic interpretation should identify what was spiked, what transformation was sought and when it was assessed. The absence of observed cleavage is useful within that defined experiment, without becoming a universal claim that dried blood cannot change after collection.

Related analysis: the study’s broader findings and limitations.

Research cited

Bantle and colleagues (2026). Determination of THC and THC-COOH in Dried Capillary Blood Spots and Comparison to Venous Blood of Recreational Cannabis Consumers in a Pilot Study.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

Carryover Testing Challenged the Analytical Sequence, Not the Newborn’s Exposure History

The neonatal assay’s carryover assessment examined whether a preceding high-concentration sample could affect a later measurement. It addressed an instrument-process question, not a biological exposure pathway. The protocol deliberately stressed the sequence The investigators used samples at twice the upper quantification limit followed by low-range samples. They considered contamination associated…

Spread the love

Read Article: Carryover Testing Challenged the Analytical Sequence, Not the Newborn’s Exposure History

The Paired Cord-and-Meconium Study Was Not a Survey of All Births

The forty-six specimen pairs came from archived cases in which both tests had been clinically ordered. Their cannabinoid-positive proportions were not population prevalence estimates. Selection followed the availability of paired orders Investigators sought residual meconium and cord tissue from the same newborn where testing for both matrices had been requested….

Spread the love

Read Article: The Paired Cord-and-Meconium Study Was Not a Survey of All Births

A Half-LLOQ Check Was Not the Same as Independently Determining Every Detection Limit

The neonatal cannabinoid study explicitly stated that each analyte’s detection limit was not specifically determined. It checked performance at half the lower quantification limit instead. The validation described what was actually tested The researchers verified relevant acceptance criteria and a signal-to-noise ratio of at least three at concentrations equivalent to…

Spread the love

Read Article: A Half-LLOQ Check Was Not the Same as Independently Determining Every Detection Limit

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 363-3347 Contact Us