Speak with an expert today (424) 363-3347(For attorneys only)

Toxicology Lawyer Talks Medical Marijuana in the Workplace

toxicology lawyer

With the recent legalization of recreational marijuana and medical marijuana in a handful of states, a common question has been raised amongst employees and employers: in states where marijuana has been legalized should it be allowed in the workplace? The answer to this question is not cut and dry, there are many perspectives and arguments both for and against. Speaking with a toxicology lawyer will be a step in the right direction when it comes to teasing out this messy arena.

While most employers would not think twice about their employees taking ibuprofen or Kaopectate, with medical marijuana being used to treat a host of medical ailments, such as pain, nausea, muscle spasms, seizures and other symptoms, there has been the concern about allowing it freely in the workplace.

Most companies do not allow smoking in the workplace, whether this be cigarette smoking or vaping. With the recent changes to the law, we can’t help but wonder whether this applies to the smoking of medical marijuana in the workplace? Smoking medical marijuana is the most common and effective way of getting the benefits that marijuana provides, but it can also be ingested. Therefore, if smoking is the problem, then it can recommend that employees take their medication via the oral route instead. This averts the smoking issue, but still leaves employers unsettled on the effects of ingesting marijuana while employees are at work.

These are the questions that have also baffled the courts, who have been faced with this issue since medical marijuana was legalized in certain states. So far it has been concluded that the use of medical marijuana in the workplace is dependent on 2 factors:

  1. The legislation surrounding medical marijuana in the state where the company is located
  2. The company’s overall feeling regarding the use of medical marijuana

Laws Regarding Marijuana Use At Work

The problem with understanding the first point is that there are many different classes of law. For this specific issue, the two laws that are important to understand are Federal Law and State Law. Federal Law is the body of law created by the federal government of a country. The Federal Law is limited because federal power is not universal, with the power to govern individuals lying in the state and State Law. State Law, as the name suggests, is only effective within a specific state. So, understanding whether medical marijuana is legal or not comes with understanding which of the two sets of law prevail, state or federal.

Federal Law

Currently, according to Federal Law, marijuana is still considered a Schedule I, highly controlled substance. This means it is classed as a drug with a high propensity for abuse and no medicinal properties. So, companies which are reliant on the federal government for things like funding (such as colleges and community health centers) are under the jurisdiction of Federal Law. This means that these companies can be held accountable for having employees who use marijuana and could lose the benefits that they receive from the federal government.

California State Law

State Law in California, on the other hand, contradicts Federal Law, with the legalization of medical marijuana. While the law is not very specific about the use in the workplace, there are other laws which protect employees. For example, State Law says that employers are not allowed to discriminate against employees who use medical marijuana. This means that a company may not refuse to hire you or fire you should you wish to disclose that you use marijuana for medical reasons. Unfortunately, employers are under the jurisdiction of deciding their own company laws, which employees are contractually supposed to follow and abide by, and can be taken to court for if broken. Therefore, employers are allowed to:

  • Prohibit the use of medical marijuana on work premises
  • Prohibit the use of medical marijuana during working hours
  • Have randomized and unnotified drug testing of all employees, but may not infringe on the rights of employees to privacy and against defamation of their character
  • Discipline employees who are found to be under the influence of marijuana while at work if the prohibition of the substance has been clearly stated to all employees
  • Evaluate the ability of an employee to continue their job should they disclose a medical disability to their employer (and thus the reason why they are using medical marijuana)

So, in the end, the real question is which of these to governing bodies will win? According to how laws in America work, if a Federal and State Law contradict, then when you’re in the state you can follow the State Law, but the feds can still choose to arrest you for breaking a Federal Law.

If you feel that you may require legal action as an employer or an employee regarding the use of medical marijuana in the workplace, contact one of our qualified toxicology lawyers. We are specialized in handling the use of toxins and drugs with regards to the law!

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

Two-faced Ed Barley

Former LASD Lab Technician’s Shifting Expert Testimony Raises Questions Background on Ed Barley’s Career Trajectory Ed Barley, a longtime laboratory technician with the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department, has recently transitioned from prosecution-side expert witness to defense consultant in DUI cases. This career shift has drawn attention from the legal community…

Spread the love

Read More

Judges CANNOT deny a continuance to prepare a California Racial Justice Act challenge

PEOPLE v. GARCIA (2022) Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5, California. The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Alejandro GARCIA, Defendant and Appellant. In 2018, a defendant was sentenced to 24 years in prison. The defendant appealed, and in July 2020, the court affirmed the judgment in part but remanded…

Spread the love

Read More

Los Angeles Superior Court Expert Witness Panel Letter

Re: Expert Witness Panel Application Dear Expert Witness Panel Committee: I am writing to address my concerns regarding my repeated and continued exclusion from the Los Angeles Superior Court expert witness panel. I am a Black man who has been licensed by the California State Bar since 2003. I hold…

Spread the love

Read More

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 283-0029 Contact Us