Repeated THC Produced Wheel-Running Tolerance Without a Detected Spontaneous Withdrawal Effect in Rats

A rat study detected clear tolerance to THC-related suppression of wheel running but no significant wheel-running change during spontaneous withdrawal. The two results show why tolerance and withdrawal should be measured separately.

The study followed both sexes continuously

Male and female Sprague-Dawley rats received THC or vehicle twice daily for seven days. THC strongly reduced voluntary home-cage wheel running initially. A later THC challenge suppressed running more in previously vehicle-treated animals than in previously THC-treated animals, indicating tolerance. The study detected no sex difference in the reported acute suppression or tolerance.

Withdrawal was assessed on the same behavioral measure

Researchers observed running for five days, beginning after the tolerance-test period. They found no significant running changes associated with spontaneous withdrawal. Unlike antagonist-precipitated models, this part of the experiment did not use receptor blockade to provoke signs.

The null finding belongs to the endpoint and regimen

A sensitive continuous activity measure can still leave other possible symptoms unmeasured. The result does not prove that all physiological adaptation was absent, particularly because tolerance was demonstrated. Nor does it invalidate withdrawal findings from different compounds, doses, exposure durations or measurement methods.

The study supports a narrow but important conclusion: repeated THC did not produce a detected spontaneous wheel-running withdrawal signal in this rat protocol. It cannot establish that people do not experience cannabis withdrawal, or that every tolerant individual necessarily has clinically meaningful withdrawal symptoms.

Related: interpreting cannabis tolerance claims.

Research cited

Hickey CM; Poling C; Grimes W; Calvert AR; Morgan MM. Tolerance but No Spontaneous Withdrawal Following Repeated THC Injections in Male and Female Rats. Cannabis and cannabinoid research (2026). doi:10.1177/25785125251404395. Findings discussed from the study abstract.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

A Rat THC–Alcohol Study Found Cross-Tolerance Without Faster Drug Disappearance

A 1979 female-rat study found THC-to-alcohol cross-tolerance on a coordination task without evidence that faster drug disappearance explained the result. The reverse direction was incomplete, so the two exposure histories were not equivalent. The challenge doses were matched by behavioral effect Acute THC and ethanol challenges were selected to reduce…

Spread the love

Read Article: A Rat THC–Alcohol Study Found Cross-Tolerance Without Faster Drug Disappearance

Behavioral THC Tolerance Did Not Eliminate Antibody-Response Suppression in Rats

A 1980 rat study reported behavioral tolerance during oral THC treatment without tolerance to suppression of selected antibody-related responses. The timing of THC relative to antigen exposure also changed the immune result. The immune challenge was experimentally defined Rats received oral THC or vehicle around an antigenic challenge with sheep…

Spread the love

Read Article: Behavioral THC Tolerance Did Not Eliminate Antibody-Response Suppression in Rats

Matched Food-Delivery Schedules Still Produced Different THC Adaptation Patterns in Monkeys

A 1980 squirrel-monkey experiment matched baseline food-delivery patterns yet found schedule-dependent adaptation to THC. The findings offered only partial support for the idea that reinforcement loss alone explains behavioral tolerance. Two response rules produced comparable baseline rewards One component required a long interval between responses, while another used a modified…

Spread the love

Read Article: Matched Food-Delivery Schedules Still Produced Different THC Adaptation Patterns in Monkeys

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 363-3347 Contact Us