Chronic THC Did Not Produce Detected Midazolam Cross-Tolerance in a Small Primate Experiment

Chronic THC changed sensitivity to cannabinoid drugs without significantly changing sensitivity to midazolam or ketamine on the tested primate response-rate measures. Tolerance to THC did not imply general tolerance to sedating drugs.

The relevant comparison involved three monkeys

In the chronic-treatment experiment, rhesus monkeys performed food-maintained and stimulus-shock-termination tasks. Researchers compared dose-response effects before and during a seventy-one-day THC regimen. The paper included additional animals and procedures, but those should not inflate the sample for this particular comparison.

Positive cannabinoid findings accompanied non-cannabinoid nulls

THC sensitivity decreased markedly, and cross-tolerance appeared in selected comparisons with synthetic cannabinoid agonists. Midazolam and ketamine dose-response sensitivity, however, was not significantly modified. These findings help distinguish receptor-related adaptation from a general reduction in responsiveness to any behavior-suppressing drug.

The null was not a combined-use safety result

The experiment assessed challenge-drug effects around a chronic THC history. It did not establish that co-use is safe, measure breathing during clinical sedation or test driving. Nonsignificance in three animals also does not prove exact equivalence or exclude smaller effects.

Use the result at its actual scale

The animals received controlled injected drugs and performed specific learned tasks. Ordinary cannabis products, other benzodiazepines, alcohol and patient populations were not interchangeable with those conditions. The study weighs against assuming universal cross-tolerance from a cannabis history while leaving individual medication response and combined-exposure risks unresolved.

Related analysis: Cannabis Tolerance Claims: Questions to Ask Before Relying on Expert Testimony.

Primary research

Chronic Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol treatment in rhesus monkeys: differential tolerance and cross-tolerance among cannabinoids. British journal of pharmacology (2011). DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01116.x.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

A CB1 Mutation Changed Cannabinoid Tolerance Differently Across Testing Methods

A receptor mutation delayed tolerance to WIN55,212-2 more consistently than to CP55,940, and the result also depended on how tolerance was measured. Fixed-dose behavior and dose-response shifts were different tests. Two agonists and several endpoints Investigators compared desensitization-resistant S426A/S430A mice with controls in thermal, formalin and chemotherapy-neuropathy experiments. Both challenge…

Spread the love

Read Article: A CB1 Mutation Changed Cannabinoid Tolerance Differently Across Testing Methods

Endocannabinoid Enzyme Inhibition Delayed Neuropathy Without Permanently Preventing It

Two FAAH inhibitors suppressed pain-related behavior during treatment, but neuropathy emerged after restricted preventive dosing stopped. Delaying an endpoint was not the same as permanently preventing the condition. Indirect cannabinoid-system modulation Researchers compared brain-permeant URB597, peripherally restricted URB937 and a direct synthetic agonist in paclitaxel-treated mice. FAAH inhibition alters endogenous…

Spread the love

Read Article: Endocannabinoid Enzyme Inhibition Delayed Neuropathy Without Permanently Preventing It

A GPR55 Barrier Study Did Not Demonstrate THC-Induced Blood–Brain Barrier Injury

A study of GPR55 activation changed experimental barrier measurements, but its test substance was lysophosphatidylinositol, not THC. A cannabinoid-related receptor label cannot substitute for the actual exposure. Cells and animals answered different questions Researchers examined rat brain microvascular endothelial cells using calcium, electrical-resistance and junction-related measurements. Animal experiments also assessed…

Spread the love

Read Article: A GPR55 Barrier Study Did Not Demonstrate THC-Induced Blood–Brain Barrier Injury

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 363-3347 Contact Us