Two Nabiximols Allodynia Trials Gave Different Average Pain Results

The nabiximols pain review describes an encouraging earlier allodynia trial followed by a larger trial without a statistically significant average pain advantage. The earlier positive result was not uniform confirmation across studies.

The earlier study favored the spray

In a trial of 125 patients with peripheral neuropathic pain characterized by allodynia, the review reports mean pain-score reductions of 1.48 points with THC:CBD spray and 0.52 with placebo. The between-group comparison was significant, with p = 0.004. Other measures, including forms of evoked allodynia and pain-related disability, also favored active treatment in that study.

The larger trial did not repeat every result

For a subsequent trial, the review’s evidence table reports an average pain advantage of 0.34 points versus placebo with p = 0.139. That mean-score comparison did not reach statistical significance. The studies also differed in duration and their analyzed populations. The two findings should therefore be described as mixed trial evidence, rather than treated as one replicated estimate of a fixed benefit.

Allodynia does not guarantee a treatment response

Allodynia describes pain provoked by stimuli that ordinarily would not be painful. It identifies a clinical feature, not a demonstrated biological rule that every affected patient responds to cannabinoids. Differences in baseline conditions, outcomes, attrition and other treatment may influence trial results, but the review does not establish one explanation for their divergence. A fair account reports the positive earlier study and the later nonsignificant mean comparison together. These human pain findings also do not establish that a symptom response predicts normal attention, motor performance or safety in other activities; those are separate outcomes.

Related analysis: the broader findings and limitations of this research.

Research cited

The study observations discussed here are reported in the supplied review: Überall (2020). A Review of Scientific Evidence for THC:CBD Oromucosal Spray (Nabiximols) in the Management of Chronic Pain. Journal of Pain Research.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

A Smoked-Cannabis Anxiety Subgroup Still Had a Nonsignificant CBD Comparison

A historical review describes a trend toward less anxiety with higher-CBD smoked cannabis that remained statistically nonsignificant, including in an analysis restricted to anxious responders. The subgroup did not establish the proposed protective effect. The initial anxiety response was generally mild The review describes an experiment comparing placebo cannabis with…

Spread the love

Read Article: A Smoked-Cannabis Anxiety Subgroup Still Had a Nonsignificant CBD Comparison

Lower Cannabis Cue Bias in High-CBD Users Did Not Establish Lower Future Dependence

A naturalistic study summarized in the historical CBD review found lower cannabis-cue bias, liking and wanting among users of higher-CBD cannabis. Those measurements did not directly establish a lower future incidence of dependence. The study measured responses related to drug interest The review describes a comparison between users choosing cannabis…

Spread the love

Read Article: Lower Cannabis Cue Bias in High-CBD Users Did Not Establish Lower Future Dependence

Hair Cannabinoids and Hippocampal Volume Supplied an Association Rather Than a Protection Trial

A small imaging study summarized in the historical review linked hair cannabinoid measurements with hippocampal volume. It did not experimentally establish that CBD protected brain structure from THC. The comparison combined imaging and hair analysis The review describes Demirakca and colleagues’ study of 11 chronic recreational cannabis users and 13…

Spread the love

Read Article: Hair Cannabinoids and Hippocampal Volume Supplied an Association Rather Than a Protection Trial

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 363-3347 Contact Us