Cannabis Blood Assay Validation Across Laboratories Still Required Authentic-Sample Checks

A commercial blood-testing kit showed broadly similar performance across participating laboratories, but the study also identified a critical limitation of blank-matrix validation: an interferent appeared in authentic cannabis-exposed specimens.

What multicenter validation tested

The investigators compared LC–MS/MS performance for THC and metabolites across laboratory sites using different instrument platforms. Their assessment included calibration, precision, accuracy, interference, carryover, matrix effects and measurement uncertainty.

This was analytical validation rather than a human impairment experiment. Similar laboratory performance supports reproducibility of the measurement process; it does not establish the meaning of a concentration for an individual driver.

An interfering compound mattered in real specimens

The method separated an interferent with mass-spectrometric characteristics overlapping THCCOOH. The paper reported that the interferent occurred in specimens from cannabis users and would not be represented by testing drug-free blank blood alone.

If it co-eluted with THCCOOH, confirmation ion ratios could fail. Thus, a clean blank and a highly linear calibration curve were not sufficient substitutes for chromatographic separation in authentic material.

Performance was not identical on every instrument

Most laboratories supported a broad calibration range, while some instrument configurations required a lower upper limit. A laboratory adopting the kit still needed evidence appropriate to its own instrument, range and casework.

The authors disclosed commercial relationships with products used in the study. Independent replication and local validation remain relevant without automatically invalidating the reported results. A case review should examine actual chromatograms, identification rules and quality controls rather than treating a kit name or accreditation reference as proof that every possible interference was excluded.

Related: Why treatment outcomes require attention to study design.

Primary research

Multi-laboratory validation of a Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol LC-MS/MS test kit designed for quantifying THC and marijuana metabolites in blood. Forensic science and criminology (2018).

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

Oral THC Affected Cognition Without a Parallel Symptom-Scale Increase in a Schizophrenia Study

An oral THC condition worsened selected cognitive outcomes without a significant parallel increase in measured psychotic symptoms several hours later. That combination of findings does not show that THC is harmless in schizophrenia or that all routes have identical effects. Several populations and treatment conditions The double-dummy laboratory study involved…

Spread the love

Read Article: Oral THC Affected Cognition Without a Parallel Symptom-Scale Increase in a Schizophrenia Study

CBD-Associated Liver Enzyme Elevations Occurred Without Reported Liver Symptoms

Healthy adults developed elevated liver enzymes during a four-week CBD trial despite not reporting corresponding liver-related symptoms. The finding shows why the absence of symptoms cannot substitute for the laboratory endpoint being studied. A repeated-dose randomized trial The trial involved 201 healthy participants overall and compared CBD at 5 mg/kg…

Spread the love

Read Article: CBD-Associated Liver Enzyme Elevations Occurred Without Reported Liver Symptoms

CBD–Terpene Sleep Trial: The Average Effect Was Smaller Than the Best-Responder Result

A CBD–terpene trial found a small average change in wearable-estimated sleep stages, while the largest reported improvements occurred in selected responders. Those responder figures should not be presented as the expected benefit for everyone with insomnia. A combined formulation and incomplete datasets The study used 300 mg CBD with eight…

Spread the love

Read Article: CBD–Terpene Sleep Trial: The Average Effect Was Smaller Than the Best-Responder Result

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 363-3347 Contact Us