JNK Inhibition Delayed THC Tolerance but Accelerated Another Cannabinoid’s Tolerance in Mice

A signaling-pathway intervention did not affect all cannabinoid agonists in the same direction. In mouse experiments, JNK inhibition reduced tolerance to selected THC effects while accelerating tolerance to CP55,940.

Several pain models were included

Researchers used acute thermal, inflammatory and cisplatin-related neuropathic pain models. The experiments compared THC with other cannabinoid agonists and included wild-type and desensitization-resistant receptor-mutant mice. The inhibitor SP600125 was an experimental probe rather than a tested clinical cannabis treatment.

The challenge compound changed the result

Pretreatment attenuated tolerance to THC-related antinociceptive or anti-allodynic effects in selected conditions. It did not produce the same benefit for WIN55,212-2, and it accelerated tolerance to CP55,940 in the tested models. The pathway therefore could not be summarized as a universal cannabinoid-tolerance switch.

Other drug effects complicate mechanism claims

The inhibitor itself showed some anti-allodynic activity in one experimental setting. A change during combined treatment must be interpreted alongside those independent effects. Genotype, dose and the particular nociceptive assay also affected the comparisons.

The practical research lesson

A mechanism identified with THC should be retested before being extended to a synthetic agonist or another pain condition. These animal findings do not establish that inhibiting JNK safely prolongs cannabis benefit in patients. They support evaluating the actual drug–pathway–endpoint combination, including results that run in the opposite direction from the hoped-for treatment effect.

Related analysis: evaluating cannabis tolerance claims.

Primary research

Henderson-Redmond AN; Nealon CM; Davis BJ; Yuill MB; Sepulveda DE; Blanton HL; Piscura MK; Zee ML; Haskins CP; Marcus DJ; Mackie K; Guindon J; Morgan DJ. c-Jun N terminal kinase signaling pathways mediate cannabinoid tolerance in an agonist-specific manner. Neuropharmacology (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2019.107847.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

A CB1 Mutation Changed Cannabinoid Tolerance Differently Across Testing Methods

A receptor mutation delayed tolerance to WIN55,212-2 more consistently than to CP55,940, and the result also depended on how tolerance was measured. Fixed-dose behavior and dose-response shifts were different tests. Two agonists and several endpoints Investigators compared desensitization-resistant S426A/S430A mice with controls in thermal, formalin and chemotherapy-neuropathy experiments. Both challenge…

Spread the love

Read Article: A CB1 Mutation Changed Cannabinoid Tolerance Differently Across Testing Methods

Endocannabinoid Enzyme Inhibition Delayed Neuropathy Without Permanently Preventing It

Two FAAH inhibitors suppressed pain-related behavior during treatment, but neuropathy emerged after restricted preventive dosing stopped. Delaying an endpoint was not the same as permanently preventing the condition. Indirect cannabinoid-system modulation Researchers compared brain-permeant URB597, peripherally restricted URB937 and a direct synthetic agonist in paclitaxel-treated mice. FAAH inhibition alters endogenous…

Spread the love

Read Article: Endocannabinoid Enzyme Inhibition Delayed Neuropathy Without Permanently Preventing It

A GPR55 Barrier Study Did Not Demonstrate THC-Induced Blood–Brain Barrier Injury

A study of GPR55 activation changed experimental barrier measurements, but its test substance was lysophosphatidylinositol, not THC. A cannabinoid-related receptor label cannot substitute for the actual exposure. Cells and animals answered different questions Researchers examined rat brain microvascular endothelial cells using calcium, electrical-resistance and junction-related measurements. Animal experiments also assessed…

Spread the love

Read Article: A GPR55 Barrier Study Did Not Demonstrate THC-Induced Blood–Brain Barrier Injury

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 363-3347 Contact Us