Enhanced CB1 Signaling Did Not Uniformly Increase Drug Reward in Mice

Mice with a desensitization-resistant CB1 receptor modestly increased consumption of dilute ethanol without showing a corresponding general increase in the tested drug-reward measures.

A genetic model, not cannabis exposure

The experiment used S426A/S430A receptor-mutant mice. It assessed voluntary ethanol drinking, conditioned place preference, acute responses and opioid dependence-related behavior. The mutation altered cannabinoid signaling; the experiment was not a comparison of human cannabis users and nonusers.

The concentration and endpoint mattered

The drinking difference appeared with the lower ethanol concentration, not uniformly across concentrations. Taste controls and selected acute-response measures did not explain it straightforwardly. Conditioned preference for the tested drugs and precipitated morphine withdrawal were not enhanced in the predicted broad fashion.

An intake signal is not an addiction diagnosis

Consumption, preference learning, acute sensitivity and dependence are related but distinct outcomes. A selective positive result cannot be converted into a global increase in addiction vulnerability. Genetic developmental effects and experimental drinking conditions further limit translation. The study supports examining specific cannabinoid-system mechanisms while rejecting a shortcut from stronger CB1 signaling to every behavioral feature of human alcohol or opioid use.

Related analysis: Cannabis Tolerance Claims: Questions to Ask Before Relying on Expert Testimony.

Primary research

Mice expressing a "hyper-sensitive" form of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor (CB1) show modestly enhanced alcohol preference and consumption. PloS one (2017). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174826.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

Low Saliva Volume Changed the Dilution of Cannabis Test Samples

A saliva specimen can contain THC and still have a collection problem that affects its reported concentration. In a controlled cannabis-smoking study, many early oral-fluid samples contained less saliva than the collection device intended. THC was nevertheless identified in every low-volume specimen collected after smoking. Detection did not make the…

Spread the love

Read Article: Low Saliva Volume Changed the Dilution of Cannabis Test Samples

Saliva Cannabis Detection Windows Change With THC AND Versus OR a Metabolite

Requiring both THC and its metabolite to exceed a cutoff can produce a different saliva detection window from accepting either compound. A controlled human cannabis-smoking study demonstrated that difference, particularly among occasional smokers. The result concerns how a test defines a positive sample; it does not establish how long a…

Spread the love

Read Article: Saliva Cannabis Detection Windows Change With THC AND Versus OR a Metabolite

A CB2 Knockout Experiment Did Not Test Whether Cannabis Causes Psychosis

A mouse experiment linked altered cannabinoid CB2 receptor function with methamphetamine-related behavioral responses. It did not administer cannabis or determine whether THC exposure caused a psychiatric disorder. The intervention was genetic receptor disruption Researchers studied mice with partial Cnr2 gene deletion and animals with deletion in a selected neuronal population….

Spread the love

Read Article: A CB2 Knockout Experiment Did Not Test Whether Cannabis Causes Psychosis

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 363-3347 Contact Us