Alcohol Changed Selected THC Pharmacokinetic Measures Without Uniform Metabolite Effects

Alcohol did not shift every cannabinoid measurement in the same direction in a controlled study of heavy cannabis users. Selected THC pharmacokinetic changes occurred while metabolite comparisons remained nonsignificant.

The observed alcohol levels differed from targets

Nineteen heavy cannabis users received three alcohol conditions, then smoked a THC cigarette during the dosing period. The reported mean steady alcohol concentrations were lower than the planned targets. An account of the experiment should use achieved exposure rather than present the targets as observed values.

Some THC results changed

The higher alcohol condition was associated with a modestly longer apparent THC elimination half-life and a lower concentration at one reported post-smoking time. The authors proposed distribution between compartments as one possible explanation.

Metabolite findings were not equivalent positives

The abstract reports no significant ethanol effect on the measured pharmacokinetics of 11-hydroxy-THC or the carboxy metabolite. A visually lower or numerically different concentration is not automatically a statistically established effect.

The study used serial blood sampling; its measurements should retain the exact analytical matrix when quantitative values are applied elsewhere. An apparent half-life is not the duration of intoxication and does not determine a person's driving clearance. Nor do these exposure findings establish behavioral cross-tolerance to alcohol. The useful result is an analyte- and time-specific interaction under a defined research regimen.

Related: interpreting cannabis tolerance claims.

Research cited

Toennes SW; Schneider K; Kauert GF; Wunder C; Moeller MR; Theunissen EL; Ramaekers JG. Influence of ethanol on cannabinoid pharmacokinetic parameters in chronic users. Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry (2011). doi:10.1007/s00216-010-4449-2. Findings discussed from the study abstract.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

Morphine-Dependent Mice Showed Local Cannabinoid Coupling Changes With Mostly Stable Receptor Binding

A mouse study found mostly unchanged cannabinoid receptor binding during morphine dependence, alongside localized changes in agonist-driven signaling. Its results caution against either declaring the cannabinoid system unchanged or describing a uniform brain-wide adaptation. Dependence was assessed independently Naloxone-induced jumping supported opioid dependence after repeated morphine exposure. The animals did…

Spread the love

Read Article: Morphine-Dependent Mice Showed Local Cannabinoid Coupling Changes With Mostly Stable Receptor Binding

Rimonabant’s Feeding Effect Faded While Lower Body Weight Persisted in Rats

In a rat study, tolerance to rimonabant's food-intake suppression developed within five days, but treated animals remained lighter than controls throughout two weeks. Feeding response and body-weight difference followed different trajectories. The experiment involved a CB1-blocking drug Adult non-obese Wistar rats received daily injected SR141716, commonly called rimonabant. Food intake…

Spread the love

Read Article: Rimonabant’s Feeding Effect Faded While Lower Body Weight Persisted in Rats

THC and Anandamide Produced Similar Movement Effects but Different Forebrain c-Fos Patterns in Rats

THC and anandamide produced similar reductions in movement and temperature in rats while differing in regional c-fos expression. Similar outward effects therefore did not establish identical forebrain responses. The study compared acute injected compounds Rats received THC or anandamide before behavioral and gene-expression assessment. The abstract noted a shorter apparent…

Spread the love

Read Article: THC and Anandamide Produced Similar Movement Effects but Different Forebrain c-Fos Patterns in Rats

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 363-3347 Contact Us