Does a Laboratory Blood-Viscosity Finding Establish Cannabis-Related Clotting Risk?

Adding cannabinoids to collected blood altered its laboratory flow properties, but that experiment did not establish a person’s risk of a clot or stroke after cannabis use. Blood viscosity, coagulation, and clinical vascular events are different endpoints.

Human specimens, in-vitro exposure

James and colleagues collected blood from 24 healthy adult nonsmokers and added THC, CBD, or cannabinoid-containing extracts outside the body. They measured viscosity, elasticity, and red-cell appearance.

The study used human-derived specimens, but participants did not receive cannabis. Calling it a human cannabis-administration trial would obscure the absence of circulation, metabolism, and other processes present in a living person.

Preserve the endpoint-specific results

Viscosity increased at several tested concentrations. THC and CBD separately did not significantly increase elasticity, whereas the extracts did. The two extract ratios did not significantly differ from each other on those measures.

Red-cell morphology was unchanged at lower tested concentrations and abnormal at higher ones. A summary stating that all concentrations destroyed cells would therefore be inaccurate. The paper’s broad conclusions should be read alongside its more specific results.

From flow measurements to a clinical opinion

Viscosity describes resistance to flow; it is not itself a demonstrated thrombus. The experiment did not measure incident strokes, clinical hemolysis, or outcomes in patients with sickle cell disease. Those consequences discussed by the authors are extrapolations requiring additional evidence.

Whole-blood spiking concentrations also cannot automatically be compared with plasma concentrations from other studies. A defensible opinion identifies the matrix, exposure procedure, and measured response before proposing a mechanism. This paper supplies a laboratory hazard signal, not an individual diagnosis, a safe-dose threshold, or proof that cannabis caused a vascular event.

The tested spiking concentrations were 0, 2.5, 25, 50, and 100 ng/mL. Viscosity increases became significant from 25 ng/mL, while cell appearance at 2.5 and 25 ng/mL resembled controls. These are concentrations added directly to collected blood. They are not administered doses, and the experiment does not establish that consuming a specified amount produces the same laboratory conditions.

Related reading: interpreting cannabis-related blood-cell findings.

Primary research

Tameika R. James; Andrea A. Richards; Dwight A. Lowe; Walton A. Reid; Charah T. Watson; Dagogo J. Pepple. The in vitro effect of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol on whole blood viscosity, elasticity and membrane integrity. Journal of Cannabis Research (2022). DOI: 10.1186/s42238-022-00126-z.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

THC/CBD Rat Brain Imaging: Why Dose and Anesthesia Limit ‘Protection’ Claims

A rat imaging study found distinct THC, CBD and combination patterns in connectivity and blood flow. The mixture moderated some THC-associated findings, but the experiment does not establish a human protective ratio or a validated impairment test. The exposures were not identical across arms Adult male rats received injected THC,…

Spread the love

Read Article: THC/CBD Rat Brain Imaging: Why Dose and Anesthesia Limit ‘Protection’ Claims

Matching Plasma THC Peaks Did Not Match Brain Exposure Across Routes in Rats

Comparable peak circulating THC did not produce identical brain and metabolite profiles after injected versus inhaled THC in rats. Matching one parent-drug concentration therefore did not make the two routes biologically interchangeable. A direct route comparison Adult male and female Sprague–Dawley rats received intraperitoneal THC or a 15-minute inhalation exposure….

Spread the love

Read Article: Matching Plasma THC Peaks Did Not Match Brain Exposure Across Routes in Rats

A Urine Paper Titled ‘THC Quantification’ Actually Targeted THC-COOH

The analyte in a laboratory method matters more than shorthand in its title. A paper titled as urinary THC quantification describes a confirmatory method for THC-COOH, the carboxy metabolite. That is not a measurement of active parent THC or contemporaneous impairment. What the method measured The investigators developed solid-phase extraction…

Spread the love

Read Article: A Urine Paper Titled ‘THC Quantification’ Actually Targeted THC-COOH

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 363-3347 Contact Us