Initial THC Sensitivity and Rapid Tolerance Were Different Measurements in Mice

How strongly an animal responds to its first THC exposure is not the same as how much its response changes at the next exposure. A mouse study measured these separately and found different sex- and strain-related patterns.

Two strains and several endpoints

Male and female C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice received repeated THC or vehicle. Investigators measured temperature, movement and tail withdrawal from a thermal stimulus. Initial sensitivity was defined relative to baseline on the first exposure; rapid tolerance was defined by the change between the first and second exposures.

The pattern depended on the test

Strain differences appeared in movement suppression and antinociception, while females showed greater initial hypothermic responses. Rapid tolerance appeared in temperature and antinociceptive measures, with much less adaptation on the movement-related measure.

Not every apparent sex contrast was significant

For rapid antinociceptive tolerance, the study found a strain effect but no significant main effect of sex or sex-by-strain interaction. Descriptive differences between group averages should not be promoted into a confirmed sex effect on that endpoint.

From a definition to an inference

A baseline-to-first-dose contrast and a first-to-second-dose contrast can vary for different reasons. Neither measurement alone describes long-term dependence or every form of cannabis impairment. The animal strains, injected regimen and brief observation period further restrict transfer to people. For research interpretation, specify how tolerance was calculated rather than assuming that a stronger first response necessarily predicts more or less later tolerance.

Related analysis: evaluating cannabis tolerance claims.

Primary research

Parks C; Jones BC; Moore BM; Mulligan MK. Sex and Strain Variation in Initial Sensitivity and Rapid Tolerance to Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol. Cannabis and cannabinoid research (2020). DOI: 10.1089/can.2019.0047.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

A CB1 Mutation Changed Cannabinoid Tolerance Differently Across Testing Methods

A receptor mutation delayed tolerance to WIN55,212-2 more consistently than to CP55,940, and the result also depended on how tolerance was measured. Fixed-dose behavior and dose-response shifts were different tests. Two agonists and several endpoints Investigators compared desensitization-resistant S426A/S430A mice with controls in thermal, formalin and chemotherapy-neuropathy experiments. Both challenge…

Spread the love

Read Article: A CB1 Mutation Changed Cannabinoid Tolerance Differently Across Testing Methods

Endocannabinoid Enzyme Inhibition Delayed Neuropathy Without Permanently Preventing It

Two FAAH inhibitors suppressed pain-related behavior during treatment, but neuropathy emerged after restricted preventive dosing stopped. Delaying an endpoint was not the same as permanently preventing the condition. Indirect cannabinoid-system modulation Researchers compared brain-permeant URB597, peripherally restricted URB937 and a direct synthetic agonist in paclitaxel-treated mice. FAAH inhibition alters endogenous…

Spread the love

Read Article: Endocannabinoid Enzyme Inhibition Delayed Neuropathy Without Permanently Preventing It

A GPR55 Barrier Study Did Not Demonstrate THC-Induced Blood–Brain Barrier Injury

A study of GPR55 activation changed experimental barrier measurements, but its test substance was lysophosphatidylinositol, not THC. A cannabinoid-related receptor label cannot substitute for the actual exposure. Cells and animals answered different questions Researchers examined rat brain microvascular endothelial cells using calcium, electrical-resistance and junction-related measurements. Animal experiments also assessed…

Spread the love

Read Article: A GPR55 Barrier Study Did Not Demonstrate THC-Induced Blood–Brain Barrier Injury

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 363-3347 Contact Us