A Cannabis Cortisol Pilot’s Association Changed After Accounting for Time

A small rimonabant experiment found an association between drug concentration and cortisol that was no longer significant after time terms were included. A hormone association should therefore not be presented without its model and sampling context.

Ten completers and only two placebo participants

The study involved cannabis-dependent men who received repeated oral THC before a single dose of rimonabant or placebo. Ten completed: eight received active rimonabant at one of two doses and two received placebo. The trial ended early when the manufacturer discontinued the drug’s development program.

Plasma cortisol was the measured endpoint

Single 20- or 40-mg rimonabant doses did not significantly increase plasma cortisol overall. Four active-treatment participants nevertheless had a later morning cortisol value above their earlier morning value. Individual trajectories and the group treatment comparison answer different questions.

Why adjustment changed the interpretation

A simpler analysis linked change in cortisol to rimonabant concentration. When time and interaction terms were added, the concentration term was nonsignificant. Cortisol normally varies over the day, making sampling time an important competing explanation. The study also reported null associations for several cannabinoid-related comparisons.

What remains unresolved

With eight active-treatment subjects and two controls, the experiment provides limited precision. It did not establish cortisol as a diagnostic test for cannabis withdrawal or show that an individual increase proves a withdrawal mechanism. Its findings are specific to the administered antagonist and prior THC regimen. They are not evidence about the safety of currently available cannabis products or a recommendation to use rimonabant.

Related analysis: evaluating cannabis tolerance claims.

Primary research

Goodwin RS; Baumann MH; Gorelick DA; Schwilke E; Schwope DM; Darwin WD; Kelly DL; Schroeder JR; Ortemann-Renon C; Bonnet D; Huestis MA. CB1 – cannabinoid receptor antagonist effects on cortisol in cannabis-dependent men. The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse (2012). DOI: 10.3109/00952990.2011.600398.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

A Five-Puff Cannabis Challenge Did Not Guarantee Identical Oral-Fluid THC Exposure

Oral-fluid cannabinoid concentrations after a five-puff smoking challenge varied with preceding oral THC treatment. Standardizing puff count did not demonstrate identical smoke deposition or absorbed dose. A controlled but complex exposure history Eleven frequent smokers completed oral THC medication periods with a smoking challenge on the fifth day. Daily oral…

Spread the love

Read Article: A Five-Puff Cannabis Challenge Did Not Guarantee Identical Oral-Fluid THC Exposure

A Later Oral-Fluid THC Median Did Not Establish a Rebound in the Same Person

An oral-fluid cannabis study reported a slightly higher median THC concentration in a late time bin than in an earlier bin. The sampling design helps explain why that does not demonstrate a new rise within an individual. Repeated smoking with scheduled collections Eleven frequent cannabis smokers lived on a closed…

Spread the love

Read Article: A Later Oral-Fluid THC Median Did Not Establish a Rebound in the Same Person

Similar Temperature Tolerance Did Not Make THC and JWH Cannabinoids Interchangeable

THC and two synthetic cannabinoids all produced tolerance to hypothermia in mice, but that shared outcome did not make their pharmacology or risk equivalent. Other effects and regional adaptations differed. A comparison of different agonists Researchers compared THC with JWH-018 and JWH-073 using telemetry and laboratory receptor assays. The acute…

Spread the love

Read Article: Similar Temperature Tolerance Did Not Make THC and JWH Cannabinoids Interchangeable

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 363-3347 Contact Us