THC Tolerance in an Early EEG Signal Did Not Extend to Every Processing Measure

A controlled study found evidence of tolerance in one early attention-related brain signal among heavy cannabis users, while a later signal remained affected. The results oppose treating a familiar user’s brain response as uniformly protected.

Comparing two use-history groups

Twelve occasional and twelve heavy users received THC and placebo in a study using divided-attention and stop-signal tasks with event-related EEG recordings. The groups were defined by their histories, not randomly assigned to acquire different use patterns. THC concentrations were measured in serum.

Early and later responses diverged

During divided attention, the early P100 response decreased after THC in occasional users but not heavy users. The later P300 response decreased in both groups. On behavioral testing, heavy users were not protected from every effect: stopping responses remained sensitive to THC.

Null results prevent a broader claim

The study did not find a THC effect on the stop-signal task’s frontal N200 measure. Several EEG and behavioral records were unavailable because of technical problems or task-performance issues, so the full recruited sample did not support every analysis. A significant result in one signal does not imply that every related neural process changed.

Applying the evidence carefully

EEG components are task-related signals, not direct readings of legal intoxication or an individual’s crash probability. The small groups, use-history differences and serum exposure differences constrain interpretation. This paper supports a distinction between stages of processing and particular functions; it does not validate an EEG threshold that clears a heavy user to drive.

Related analysis: evaluating cannabis tolerance claims.

Primary research

Theunissen EL; Kauert GF; Toennes SW; Moeller MR; Sambeth A; Blanchard MM; Ramaekers JG. Neurophysiological functioning of occasional and heavy cannabis users during THC intoxication. Psychopharmacology (2012). DOI: 10.1007/s00213-011-2479-x.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

A Five-Puff Cannabis Challenge Did Not Guarantee Identical Oral-Fluid THC Exposure

Oral-fluid cannabinoid concentrations after a five-puff smoking challenge varied with preceding oral THC treatment. Standardizing puff count did not demonstrate identical smoke deposition or absorbed dose. A controlled but complex exposure history Eleven frequent smokers completed oral THC medication periods with a smoking challenge on the fifth day. Daily oral…

Spread the love

Read Article: A Five-Puff Cannabis Challenge Did Not Guarantee Identical Oral-Fluid THC Exposure

A Later Oral-Fluid THC Median Did Not Establish a Rebound in the Same Person

An oral-fluid cannabis study reported a slightly higher median THC concentration in a late time bin than in an earlier bin. The sampling design helps explain why that does not demonstrate a new rise within an individual. Repeated smoking with scheduled collections Eleven frequent cannabis smokers lived on a closed…

Spread the love

Read Article: A Later Oral-Fluid THC Median Did Not Establish a Rebound in the Same Person

Similar Temperature Tolerance Did Not Make THC and JWH Cannabinoids Interchangeable

THC and two synthetic cannabinoids all produced tolerance to hypothermia in mice, but that shared outcome did not make their pharmacology or risk equivalent. Other effects and regional adaptations differed. A comparison of different agonists Researchers compared THC with JWH-018 and JWH-073 using telemetry and laboratory receptor assays. The acute…

Spread the love

Read Article: Similar Temperature Tolerance Did Not Make THC and JWH Cannabinoids Interchangeable

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 363-3347 Contact Us