An Increase in Pre-Employment Cannabis Positivity Is Not an Increase in Measured Impairment

A clinic’s rising cannabis urine positivity rate measures a change in detected exposure, not a measured rise in workplace impairment. A California retrospective study also demonstrates why absolute and relative changes must be reported together.

Which result counted as positive?

Sharip and Razavi reviewed 21,546 pre-employment screenings from one occupational medicine clinic during 2017–2022. Initial urine immunoassays used a 50 ng/mL THC-COOH cutoff, with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry confirmation at 15 ng/mL.

The target was a metabolite in urine. Neither stage measured work performance, attention, or a contemporaneous blood THC concentration.

A large relative change from a small baseline

Positivity increased from approximately 0.12% to 0.94%, a statistically significant trend. The large reported relative increase accompanied an absolute change of about 0.82 percentage points. Omitting the starting rate can make the practical scale difficult to assess.

The paper describes the ages and sexes of positive cases, but lacks complete demographic denominators for everyone screened. A larger share of positives in a subgroup does not, without those denominators, establish a higher subgroup positivity rate.

What caused the trend?

The time period followed changes in cannabis availability, but the study did not randomize access or establish legalization as the sole cause. Selection into screening, clinic population changes, exposure patterns, and other unmeasured factors could contribute.

The results are useful for understanding this clinic’s testing experience. They do not estimate the number of impaired workers or determine a particular applicant’s fitness. Any employment-law question requires current legal analysis separate from the paper’s historical testing data; the analytical finding itself concerns metabolite detection.

Related reading: why urine and blood results are not interchangeable.

Primary research

Akbar Sharip; Roshan Razavi. Pre-employment urine drug screening: examining trends in THC-COOH positivity rates post-legalization of recreational cannabis in California – a retrospective review. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology (London, England) (2025). DOI: 10.1186/s12995-025-00468-3.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

Can THC Analgesia Be Separated From Memory Effects? A Peptide Experiment in Mice

An experimental peptide preserved THC-related analgesic responses while preventing a memory-task deficit in mice. The result is a preclinical drug-development finding, not evidence that an available supplement makes cannabis use free of cognitive effects. Targeting a receptor interaction Gallo and colleagues investigated peptides designed to disrupt an interaction between cannabinoid…

Spread the love

Read Article: Can THC Analgesia Be Separated From Memory Effects? A Peptide Experiment in Mice

Can Cannabis Users Self-Titrate Across Different Potencies? What Blood Verification Adds

Different amounts of cannabis flower did not necessarily produce different measured THC-related blood exposure in a preliminary naturalistic study. The finding supports investigating self-titration, rather than assuming product potency alone determines absorbed dose. A three-day product assignment Bidwell and colleagues enrolled 24 male cannabis users and asked them to use…

Spread the love

Read Article: Can Cannabis Users Self-Titrate Across Different Potencies? What Blood Verification Adds

Prenatal THC and the Placenta: Why Normal Maternal Weight Did Not Exclude Fetal Effects in Rats

Normal maternal weight gain did not exclude fetal-growth and placental findings in a rat THC experiment. Different maternal and fetal endpoints can respond differently to the same exposure. The exposure and assessments The investigators administered THC or vehicle to pregnant Wistar rats during gestation. They assessed maternal food intake and…

Spread the love

Read Article: Prenatal THC and the Placenta: Why Normal Maternal Weight Did Not Exclude Fetal Effects in Rats

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 363-3347 Contact Us