Uber Technologies v. Law Group of South Florida: Case Filing

Multi-party legal case file beside a courthouse and route map

Article overview: This post presents and analyzes the filing in Uber Technologies, Inc. v. Law Group of South Florida, LLC, focusing on the allegations, procedural posture and issues raised by the parties.

SEO structure updated July 24, 2026.

 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,  Plaintiff,  v.  LAW GROUP OF SOUTH FLORIDA, LLC, ANDY LOYNAZ, RIVER MEDICAL CENTER, INC., PROFESSIONAL OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC., ET AL.

What the South Florida filing contains

The complaint presents Uber’s allegations against Law Group of South Florida and the other named defendants. It is not a final adjudication, but it is the primary source for the pleaded factual theory, causes of action and requested relief.

Compare related records in Uber versus plaintiffs’ attorneys.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

In-Custody Deaths, Toxicology, and the End of Excited Delirium in California

California bars excited delirium as a diagnosis and civil evidence. Learn what AB 360 means for in-custody death toxicology and section 1983 causation.

Spread the love

Read More

Vehicle Code Section 21221: What Actually Applies to a Motorized Scooter Rider

California Vehicle Code section 21221 applies driver rules to scooter riders, while section 21221.5 creates a separate $250 under-the-influence offense.

Spread the love

Read More

An E-Bike Is Not a Motor Vehicle: Beale v. DMV Bars Refusal Suspensions

Beale v. DMV held that California cannot suspend a driver’s license for chemical-test refusal arising from an electric-bicycle ride. Analysis of the ruling, controlling statutes, limits, and defense strategy.

Spread the love

Read More

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 363-3347 Contact Us