I was in my office one day and the receptionist said there was someone there to see me. I said, “tell him that I am busy, and he needs to make an appointment.” She calls back 30 seconds later and said “it is an FBI agent!” I said, “how do you know that?” She said, “I asked for ID, and he showed me…
A litigation-focused guide to separating drug identity, product purity, dose, timing, effect, intent, and the laboratory records needed to evaluate each.
Read Article: MDMA and Ecstasy Evidence in Court: Identity, Purity, Dose, and Laboratory Records
California framework for admitting and challenging forensic toxicology expert testimony under Evidence Code §§ 720, 801 and 802, including Sargon reliability review and Kelly issues for novel scientific techniques.
Read Article: California Forensic Toxicology Expert Testimony: Evidence Code, Sargon & Kelly
A cannabis DUI framework separating proof of prior use, recent use, driving-time impairment, and crash causation using toxicology, SFST, and crash-risk research.
Read Article: Cannabis DUI Evidence: Four Questions That Must Remain Separate