BMI Did Not Predict the Last THC-Positive Blood Sample in a Small Abstinence Study

Body mass index did not significantly predict time to the last THC-positive whole-blood specimen in a small study of frequent users. That null finding limits a simple body-size prediction, while leaving unanswered questions about body composition and individual differences.

The reported association was not significant

Karschner and colleagues followed 25 frequent cannabis users during monitored abstinence. For participants with positive THC specimens, the reported BMI correlation with time to the last positive specimen was −0.2, with p = 0.445.

This was not evidence for a reliable BMI-based detection clock. Nor did the nonsignificant result prove that adipose tissue has no role in cannabinoid disposition. BMI is a body-size index, not a direct measure of fat percentage or tissue THC stores.

The sex observation was exploratory

Five participants remained THC-positive throughout the seven sampling days, and all five were female. The authors discussed possible explanations, including body burden and physiological differences. They did not measure body fat percentage.

The participant with the highest THC concentrations had the lowest BMI among the women. Together, these observations resist a one-variable explanation. A small observed subgroup is not a validated sex-specific prediction rule.

Do not convert a hypothesis into a personal estimate

The sample was small and selected for extensive cannabis-use histories. The last positive also depended on the sampling schedule and quantification limit. These constraints belong in any application.

The supported conclusion is that this study did not establish BMI as a useful individual predictor of the reported endpoint. It supplied hypotheses for further research, rather than a formula for determining recency or impairment from sex and body size.

Related: Separating cannabis exposure from impairment.

Research cited

Karschner EL; Schwilke EW; Lowe RH; et al.. Addiction (2009). Do delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol concentrations indicate recent use in chronic cannabis users?.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

A Randomized CBD Burnout Study Was Open-Label and Did Not Test Antiviral Efficacy

Random assignment did not make a CBD burnout study blinded, and improvement in pandemic-related distress did not demonstrate treatment of viral infection. A supplied review’s account of the BONSAI study requires both distinctions. The clinical target was burnout and emotional distress The review describes a prospective, randomized, open-label study of…

Spread the love

Read Article: A Randomized CBD Burnout Study Was Open-Label and Did Not Test Antiviral Efficacy

Smoking-Related Lung Observations Did Not Isolate THC as the Cause

Lung findings in people who smoked cannabis cannot automatically be attributed to THC alone. A historical chapter recognized that smoke contains multiple plant constituents and combustion products, making component-specific claims more difficult than simply identifying cannabis use. The chapter assembled different kinds of evidence Nahas discussed clinical reports of respiratory…

Spread the love

Read Article: Smoking-Related Lung Observations Did Not Isolate THC as the Cause

Historical Developmental-Toxicity Reports Used Different Cannabis Preparations

Historical developmental-toxicity findings varied across cannabis extracts, purified cannabinoids, animal species and exposure procedures. A chapter describing those experiments does not support treating every result as a controlled comparison of the same substance. The chapter described conflicting animal observations Nahas summarized developmental findings after cannabis resin or concentrated extracts and…

Spread the love

Read Article: Historical Developmental-Toxicity Reports Used Different Cannabis Preparations

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 363-3347 Contact Us