A Cochrane MS Review Found Stronger Evidence for Spasticity Relief Than for Neuropathic Pain

A 2022 Cochrane review found moderate-certainty evidence that nabiximols improves patient-reported spasticity in multiple sclerosis, while evidence for substantial neuropathic-pain relief was very uncertain. One symptomatic benefit did not establish equal evidence across all outcomes.

The review assessed benefits and harms separately

Twenty-five randomized trials included 3,763 participants and multiple cannabinoid preparations. The interventions and outcome-specific evidence bases differed. A total participant count should not be assigned to every individual endpoint.

Patient-reported spasticity was not all of quality of life

The review found probable benefit for perceived spasticity and global improvement, but little to no demonstrated quality-of-life effect with low-certainty evidence. Symptom relief can matter while leaving broader functioning or well-being questions unresolved.

Discontinuation and adverse effects remained relevant

Cannabinoids could increase discontinuation and selected nervous-system or psychiatric adverse effects. Evidence on drug tolerance was very uncertain, and the trials were relatively short. A favorable symptom result therefore should not be presented as proof of long-term safety or absence of adaptation.

Interpreting the evidence

This synthesis supports an outcome-specific benefit-risk account, not one general claim that cannabinoids treat MS. It does not establish disease modification or a personal treatment decision, and the differing certainty ratings belong alongside the findings.

Related reading: interpreting cannabis tolerance claims.

Research reference

Filippini G; Minozzi S; Borrelli F; Cinquini M; Dwan K (2022). Cannabis and cannabinoids for symptomatic treatment for people with multiple sclerosis. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD013444.pub2.

This analysis draws on the supplied review abstract.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

Cannabinoid Effects on Habit Memory Should Not Be Relabeled as Better Memory Overall

A 2015 review distinguished dorsal-striatal habit or stimulus–response memory from other memory systems. A finding of stronger habitual responding does not establish a general cognitive benefit. The reviewed tasks measured a particular learning process The source discussed maze studies, genetic manipulations and human cannabis-user observations. These approaches assess different pieces…

Spread the love

Read Article: Cannabinoid Effects on Habit Memory Should Not Be Relabeled as Better Memory Overall

A Human Tolerance Review Found Different Degrees of Adaptation Across Cognitive and Cardiac Outcomes

A 2018 systematic review found evidence that tolerance varied across human response domains. Its synthesis described stronger cognitive adaptation in some studies than attenuation of intoxicating, psychotomimetic or cardiac effects. The evidence included two comparison types Some studies compared people with different cannabis-use histories; others examined repeated administration. A between-group…

Spread the love

Read Article: A Human Tolerance Review Found Different Degrees of Adaptation Across Cognitive and Cardiac Outcomes

Functional Driving Tests Need Validation for the Claim They Make, Even When Concentration Tests Are Limited

A 2019 perspective reviewed limitations of concentration-based and functional approaches to cannabis-impaired driving. Weakness in one approach does not automatically validate the other for every intended inference. The methods address different observations A concentration test measures a chemical in its specimen, while a functional task measures performance under test conditions….

Spread the love

Read Article: Functional Driving Tests Need Validation for the Claim They Make, Even When Concentration Tests Are Limited

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 363-3347 Contact Us