A Six-Person THC Study Found Pharmacokinetic Changes That Did Not Account for Observed Tolerance

A 1980 human study found changes in THC disposition during repeated oral administration, yet concluded that those changes could not account for the observed cardiovascular, psychological and skin-temperature tolerance. Detecting a pharmacokinetic change is different from demonstrating that it explains adaptation.

The challenge measured parent drug in plasma

Six subjects received repeated oral THC, with intravenous labeled THC challenges before and after that regimen. Pharmacokinetic evaluation used unchanged THC in plasma. This design separates the repeated exposure from the route used to characterize disposition.

Some parameters changed and others did not

Average clearance and an initial apparent distribution volume increased, while steady-state distribution volume and many model-dependent measures were unchanged. The pattern did not support treating every aspect of disposition as uniformly faster or larger after tolerance developed.

Urine represented only one elimination component

The fraction excreted in urine decreased, while total urine-plus-fecal elimination was not significantly changed. Total-metabolite observations also remained different from a selective parent-THC measurement. A change in one excretion pathway should not be labeled a change in total elimination without that comparison.

Interpreting the evidence

This small historical experiment illustrates the need to distinguish association from explanatory sufficiency. Its regimen and modeling cannot supply an individual's clearance rate or impairment timeline, and the authors' conclusion does not establish that pharmacokinetics never contributes to tolerance under other conditions.

Related reading: interpreting cannabis tolerance claims.

Research reference

Hunt CA; Jones RT (1980). Tolerance and disposition of tetrahydrocannabinol in man. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. PubMed research record.

This analysis draws on the supplied abstract.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

Cannabinoid Effects on Habit Memory Should Not Be Relabeled as Better Memory Overall

A 2015 review distinguished dorsal-striatal habit or stimulus–response memory from other memory systems. A finding of stronger habitual responding does not establish a general cognitive benefit. The reviewed tasks measured a particular learning process The source discussed maze studies, genetic manipulations and human cannabis-user observations. These approaches assess different pieces…

Spread the love

Read Article: Cannabinoid Effects on Habit Memory Should Not Be Relabeled as Better Memory Overall

A Human Tolerance Review Found Different Degrees of Adaptation Across Cognitive and Cardiac Outcomes

A 2018 systematic review found evidence that tolerance varied across human response domains. Its synthesis described stronger cognitive adaptation in some studies than attenuation of intoxicating, psychotomimetic or cardiac effects. The evidence included two comparison types Some studies compared people with different cannabis-use histories; others examined repeated administration. A between-group…

Spread the love

Read Article: A Human Tolerance Review Found Different Degrees of Adaptation Across Cognitive and Cardiac Outcomes

Functional Driving Tests Need Validation for the Claim They Make, Even When Concentration Tests Are Limited

A 2019 perspective reviewed limitations of concentration-based and functional approaches to cannabis-impaired driving. Weakness in one approach does not automatically validate the other for every intended inference. The methods address different observations A concentration test measures a chemical in its specimen, while a functional task measures performance under test conditions….

Spread the love

Read Article: Functional Driving Tests Need Validation for the Claim They Make, Even When Concentration Tests Are Limited

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 363-3347 Contact Us