A Historical Nabilone Study Found Tolerance to Some Effects While Relaxation Persisted

A 1975 human study found that repeated nabilone reduced some subjective and physiological responses while relaxation persisted. The result illustrates selective adaptation to a synthetic cannabinoid-related drug, not equivalence with marijuana.

Acute effects depended on dose

Single doses produced dose-related central effects. Lower conditions caused relaxation and sedation with fewer other reported effects, while the highest condition produced marked postural hypotension. Supine pressure and tachycardia findings did not follow the same pattern. Position-specific blood-pressure change should not be summarized as no cardiovascular effect.

Repeated administration changed selected responses

Euphoria and dry mouth appeared early during twice-daily treatment and then became tolerant, without an apparent reduction in relaxation. A later larger challenge also produced fewer signs and symptoms than after a placebo period. That finding does not mean every outcome normalized or every participant had the same response.

The compound and historical setting matter

Nabilone is a modified cannabinoid-related drug with its own pharmacology. Its milligram doses cannot be substituted for THC doses, and its observed effects cannot establish the response to smoked or oral cannabis products. The supplied abstract does not establish current prescribing recommendations.

The study contributes an early example of separating desired and other effects during repeated administration. It does not establish clinical safety from tolerance alone. Dose, posture, exposure history and the individual endpoint are necessary parts of its interpretation.

Related: interpreting cannabis tolerance claims.

Research cited

Lemberger L; Rowe H. Clinical pharmacology of nabilone, a cannabinol derivative. Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics (1975). doi:10.1002/cpt1975186720. Findings discussed from the study abstract.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

A Psychiatric CBD Review’s Recommendation Grades Included Both CBD and THC-Containing Nabiximols

A review published in 2020 graded psychiatric evidence from studies of CBD and CBD-containing nabiximols. Its recommendation labels should not be quoted as though every underlying intervention was purified CBD or every study was randomized. The included designs ranged widely The review identified 23 relevant studies spanning case reports, case…

Spread the love

Read Article: A Psychiatric CBD Review’s Recommendation Grades Included Both CBD and THC-Containing Nabiximols

CBD Eye Research: Molecular Targets and Clinical Ocular Treatment Are Different Evidence Levels

A 2021 ocular CBD review brought together in-vitro and in-vivo research, proposed molecular targets and possible therapeutic applications. This evidence maps a development pathway; it does not establish that CBD products are effective eye treatments. The experimental system belongs in the conclusion A cellular result can identify a target or…

Spread the love

Read Article: CBD Eye Research: Molecular Targets and Clinical Ocular Treatment Are Different Evidence Levels

CBD Addiction Research Measures Reinforcement, Motivation and Withdrawal as Different Outcomes

A 2021 review evaluated CBD research on reinforcing, motivational and withdrawal-related drug effects. These outcomes can inform substance-use-disorder research, but an improvement in one cannot establish successful treatment across all of them. The source combined preclinical and clinical reports The review covered alcohol, opioids, cannabinoids, nicotine and psychostimulants. An animal…

Spread the love

Read Article: CBD Addiction Research Measures Reinforcement, Motivation and Withdrawal as Different Outcomes

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 363-3347 Contact Us