Food Cravings Persisted After Dronabinol’s Calorie Effect Faded in a Small Trial

In a seven-person controlled study, repeated oral THC increased reported food cravings even after its initial increase in measured caloric intake was no longer apparent. Appetite-related self-report and actual food consumption did not tell the same story.

The participants served as their own comparison

Seven HIV-positive men who regularly smoked marijuana completed two residential stays with dronabinol or placebo. Dronabinol supplied oral THC four times daily. Investigators compared the first and second eight-day phases of each stay. Food reporting was checked through observation and examination of discarded packaging.

The early calorie effect did not persist

Dronabinol increased daily caloric intake during days one through eight, largely through more eating occasions. There was no corresponding significant intake increase during days nine through sixteen. Cravings for selected food categories remained elevated across both phases, and mood-related drug effects also persisted.

Selective tolerance was an interpretation

The authors favored tolerance to the intake and sleep effects, rather than uniform tolerance to all THC effects. They considered food boredom as an alternative, although placebo intake and the range of available foods argued against it. Persistent craving therefore could not be used as proof of sustained nutritional benefit.

The trial did not establish a general dosing rule

The sample was small, male, medically selected and already familiar with cannabis. Participants were not anorexic at baseline. The regimen did not demonstrate sustained weight gain or establish outcomes in cannabis-naïve patients. The findings support measuring food intake and weight directly when evaluating a claimed appetite benefit, rather than treating favorable subjective reports as a complete efficacy assessment.

Related analysis: Cannabis Tolerance Claims: Questions to Ask Before Relying on Expert Testimony.

Primary research

Efficacy and tolerability of high-dose dronabinol maintenance in HIV-positive marijuana smokers: a controlled laboratory study. Psychopharmacology (2010). DOI: 10.1007/s00213-010-1995-4.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

A CB1 Mutation Changed Cannabinoid Tolerance Differently Across Testing Methods

A receptor mutation delayed tolerance to WIN55,212-2 more consistently than to CP55,940, and the result also depended on how tolerance was measured. Fixed-dose behavior and dose-response shifts were different tests. Two agonists and several endpoints Investigators compared desensitization-resistant S426A/S430A mice with controls in thermal, formalin and chemotherapy-neuropathy experiments. Both challenge…

Spread the love

Read Article: A CB1 Mutation Changed Cannabinoid Tolerance Differently Across Testing Methods

Endocannabinoid Enzyme Inhibition Delayed Neuropathy Without Permanently Preventing It

Two FAAH inhibitors suppressed pain-related behavior during treatment, but neuropathy emerged after restricted preventive dosing stopped. Delaying an endpoint was not the same as permanently preventing the condition. Indirect cannabinoid-system modulation Researchers compared brain-permeant URB597, peripherally restricted URB937 and a direct synthetic agonist in paclitaxel-treated mice. FAAH inhibition alters endogenous…

Spread the love

Read Article: Endocannabinoid Enzyme Inhibition Delayed Neuropathy Without Permanently Preventing It

A GPR55 Barrier Study Did Not Demonstrate THC-Induced Blood–Brain Barrier Injury

A study of GPR55 activation changed experimental barrier measurements, but its test substance was lysophosphatidylinositol, not THC. A cannabinoid-related receptor label cannot substitute for the actual exposure. Cells and animals answered different questions Researchers examined rat brain microvascular endothelial cells using calcium, electrical-resistance and junction-related measurements. Animal experiments also assessed…

Spread the love

Read Article: A GPR55 Barrier Study Did Not Demonstrate THC-Induced Blood–Brain Barrier Injury

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 363-3347 Contact Us