Transdermal CBD’s Open-Label Seizure Improvement Did Not Reverse Its Blinded Null Result

Transdermal CBD did not significantly reduce seizure frequency compared with placebo during a blinded adult focal-epilepsy trial. Improvement during the later open-label extension answered a different question and did not overturn that randomized comparison.

A daily-dose distinction clarified by correction

The trial randomized 188 adults to transdermal CBD or placebo. The corrected dose description specifies 195 mg or 390 mg daily. Published corrections addressed dosing wording in the abstract and visual abstract, and a separate collaborator-list omission.

At 12 weeks, neither CBD group significantly separated from placebo on seizure frequency. The reported comparisons had p values of 0.89 and 0.32. Those are efficacy findings for this population, formulation and treatment period.

The extension lacked a placebo comparison

Many participants entered an open-label extension, and substantial seizure reductions were reported over continued treatment. However, participants and investigators then knew active treatment was being given.

Without a concurrent blinded placebo group, the extension cannot separate medication effects from persistent placebo response, time, selection of continuing participants or other changes. The original authors explicitly discussed that limitation.

What the results leave open

The trial excluded clobazam, a medication with a known CBD interaction, and focal epilepsy is heterogeneous. Dose, formulation and duration could matter. These explanations are reasons for further research rather than proof that an unobserved blinded benefit existed.

The findings should not be generalized to every seizure syndrome or compared directly with oral-CBD trials without considering those differences. The defensible account preserves the null randomized endpoint, the separate extension observations and the corrected daily doses.

The dose correction is available at DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28862. It concerns accurate reporting of administration, not a new positive efficacy result.

Related: How study design affects interpretation of CBD outcomes.

Primary research

Adjunctive Transdermal Cannabidiol for Adults With Focal Epilepsy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Network Open (2022).

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

Oral THC Affected Cognition Without a Parallel Symptom-Scale Increase in a Schizophrenia Study

An oral THC condition worsened selected cognitive outcomes without a significant parallel increase in measured psychotic symptoms several hours later. That combination of findings does not show that THC is harmless in schizophrenia or that all routes have identical effects. Several populations and treatment conditions The double-dummy laboratory study involved…

Spread the love

Read Article: Oral THC Affected Cognition Without a Parallel Symptom-Scale Increase in a Schizophrenia Study

CBD-Associated Liver Enzyme Elevations Occurred Without Reported Liver Symptoms

Healthy adults developed elevated liver enzymes during a four-week CBD trial despite not reporting corresponding liver-related symptoms. The finding shows why the absence of symptoms cannot substitute for the laboratory endpoint being studied. A repeated-dose randomized trial The trial involved 201 healthy participants overall and compared CBD at 5 mg/kg…

Spread the love

Read Article: CBD-Associated Liver Enzyme Elevations Occurred Without Reported Liver Symptoms

CBD–Terpene Sleep Trial: The Average Effect Was Smaller Than the Best-Responder Result

A CBD–terpene trial found a small average change in wearable-estimated sleep stages, while the largest reported improvements occurred in selected responders. Those responder figures should not be presented as the expected benefit for everyone with insomnia. A combined formulation and incomplete datasets The study used 300 mg CBD with eight…

Spread the love

Read Article: CBD–Terpene Sleep Trial: The Average Effect Was Smaller Than the Best-Responder Result

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 363-3347 Contact Us