Speak with an expert today (424) 363-3347(For attorneys only)

Judge Byrdsong Accused of Anti-Semitism

Judge Byrdsong even purported to overturn every single one of his discovery orders without due process of law, when Discovery Referee Judge Bruguera actually recommended that Farmers counsel be sanctioned, having lied to the Discovery Referee and created a false record. Judge Byrdsong then decided – again without due process of law – that he would throw out

EVERY DISCOVERY ORDER and just make new rulings, based on what he felt like, not on law, (which he regularly does), on every discovery issue ever raised in the lawsuit for (more than) four years. LAW HAS HAD NO PLACE IN THIS LITIGATION IN FAVOR OF JUDGE BYRDSONG’S BIASED WHIMS AND DECREES, DESPITE PLAINTIFF NEVER AGREEING TO WAIVE ACTUAL LAW OR DUE PROCESS OF LAW. He happily, literally smiling at times, did this to discriminate, harass and retaliate against Plaintiff and his counsel for complaining of religious discrimination, harassment and retaliation regarding religious observance.

Those are also Constitutional issues. So, it is foreseeable that Judge Byrdsong will neverrule against Farmers for any material purpose or enforce any orders against them going forward, just as he has not done for the more than four years the case was pending. He wants to continue his discrimination against Plaintiff and his counsel. He hates Plaintiff and his counsel. It’s not a question of “not liking how things are going.” It’s about flagrant bias and antisemitism.”

Excerpt from “PLAINTIFF COSTIGAN’S REPLY REGARDING HIS MOTION FOR AN ORDER ENFORCING THE PARTIES’ MUTUAL FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT” filed by Nancy Anfanger, attorney for the Plantiff, on January 17, 2025 in Los Angeles Superior Court case titled Costigan vs. FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, a reciprocal interinsurance exchange, et al., case number 20STCV18816.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

Talk about a nice answer to a challenge by Counsel!

[When] asked whether the FBI’s decision to test hair for cocaine demonstrates such tests are generally accepted as being reliable in the scientific community, Okorocha disagreed, stating the FBI uses other procedures, such as polygraph, which are not generally accepted as reliable.Imperial Cty. Dep’t of Soc. Servs. v. J.M. (In re…

Spread the love

Read More

Always nice to see Courts quoting me!

Okorie Okorocha — Plaintiffs’ Toxicology Expert Plaintiffs called Okorie Okorocha, a forensic toxicologist and lawyer, to testify to the testing performed on the fluid samples taken from Andrade’s body. He rendered opinions on both the methamphetamine and alcohol testing and what he viewed as flaws in the resulting evidence. As to…

Spread the love

Read More

Remember Ranger Wiens & Tanya Ortega’s masterful trial performance?

In this case, Kayleigh McCall v. Coast Line Distributing, Inc. and Paul Anthony CejaIn San Luis Obispo County Court, the jury grants punitive damages to the employer due to the truck driver’s illicit drug use; $2.1 million.Plaintiff Kayleigh McCall experienced a moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI) and a facet injury…

Spread the love

Read More

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 283-0029 Contact Us