Speak with an expert today (424) 363-3347(For attorneys only)

Dram Shop Law in Alaska

dram shop

Alaska’s Dram Shop Laws

In my previous post, I explained the basic tenets of dram shop laws. In the next series of articles, I’ll be looking at dram shop laws for specific states.

Recap: What is dram shop law?
Dram shop laws can essentially hold third party licensed alcohol providers – like bars, taverns, and other hospitality businesses – legally liable for injuries caused by drunken customers.

Typically, the bar is only accountable if it can be proved that they continued to serve alcohol to an already-intoxicated patron, or if they served alcohol to an underage patron. However, the extent and application of dram shop laws varies from state to state.

The purpose of dram shop laws is to encourage licensed alcohol providers to take some responsibility for ensuring the safety of others, by not allowing patrons to become incredibly intoxicated – thereby risking damage to themselves or others through reckless behavior.

Dram Shop Law in Alaska
Interestingly enough, Alaska’s dram shop laws actually protect third party licensed providers from civil liability if a drunk patron causes injury to others, except for two conditions:

  • If the establishment provides alcohol to a patron under the age of 21, unless that patron provides identification indicating that they are of legal drinking age (i.e. they use a fake ID).
  • If the establishment provides alcohol to a patron who is already clearly intoxicated.

More often than not, drinking establishments in Alaska find themselves in trouble for the second exception. If a third party provider contravenes this exception, they can be held responsible for “criminal negligence”. In this case, criminal negligence assumes that, while the establishment has not necessarily acted with malicious intent, they should have nonetheless anticipated the possible consequences of serving alcohol to an already-drunk patron. It assumes that a reasonable person (or in this case establishment) would have the foresight to see how their actions could have larger ramifications.

However, if a plaintiff – for instance, someone injured by a drunk driver – brings a dram shop case to court in Alaska, they must be able to prove that the patron was already drunk when the establishment served them alcohol. The plaintiff and their attorney must show that the patron was already mentally or physically impaired and displaying signs of this impairment when they were served alcohol. This kind of evidence may take the form of video footage from inside the establishment, or eye witness accounts.

It’s also interesting to note that Alaska’s dram shop laws do not cover damages caused by someone who was drinking at a private party (not a licensed provider of alcohol). This is actually covered set of laws, known as “social host liability”.

Alaska also does not allow someone to claim civil liability against an establishment if they were intoxicated and caused harm to themselves. So, if a drunk patron drives into a tree and injures themselves, they cannot sue the establishment.

You can find the full text of Alaska’s dram shop laws in “Alaska Statutes – Section 04.21.020” (covering the civil liability of licensed alcohol providers) and “Alaska Statutes – Section 04.21.030” (which covers prohibitions against serving alcohol to intoxicated persons).

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

Misconduct of Judge Robert S. Draper (Part two)-“You better be able to f*** better than you can type.” Yes, he actually said it!

This is a discussion that Judge Draper attempted to force upon a female African-American attorney with 40 years of experience: Judge Draper: And I use the term that my wife says is not politically acceptable. I think they are politically acceptable because I use terms like “coal black” and “light…

Spread the love

Read More

Misconduct of Judge Robert S. Draper (Part one)

Judge Robert S. Draper presently presides over Dept. V of the Los Angeles County Santa Monica Courthouse. He has some serious misconduct issues. Here is the NOTICE OF FORMAL PROCEEDINGS from the Commission on Judicial Performance–The entity that is supposed to regulate judges. This is what his honor turned in…

Spread the love

Read More

Talk about a nice answer to a challenge by Counsel!

[When] asked whether the FBI’s decision to test hair for cocaine demonstrates such tests are generally accepted as being reliable in the scientific community, Okorocha disagreed, stating the FBI uses other procedures, such as polygraph, which are not generally accepted as reliable.Imperial Cty. Dep’t of Soc. Servs. v. J.M. (In re…

Spread the love

Read More

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 283-0029 Contact Us