Uber Technologies v. Wingate, Russotti, Shapiro, Moses & Halperin

Uber logo sticker on a car windshield

Article overview: This article explains Uber Technologies v. Wingate, Russotti, Shapiro, Moses & Halperin and the scientific, legal or practical considerations discussed in the source material.

SEO structure updated July 24, 2026.

What the New York filing contains

The linked complaint sets out Uber’s allegations against the named law firms and related defendants. A complaint is advocacy rather than a final judgment, but it is the primary record for evaluating the pleaded theory, alleged conduct and requested relief.

Compare the related filings in Uber versus plaintiffs’ attorneys.

Spread the love


The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Loading...

Recent Blog Articles

In-Custody Deaths, Toxicology, and the End of Excited Delirium in California

California bars excited delirium as a diagnosis and civil evidence. Learn what AB 360 means for in-custody death toxicology and section 1983 causation.

Spread the love

Read More

Vehicle Code Section 21221: What Actually Applies to a Motorized Scooter Rider

California Vehicle Code section 21221 applies driver rules to scooter riders, while section 21221.5 creates a separate $250 under-the-influence offense.

Spread the love

Read More

An E-Bike Is Not a Motor Vehicle: Beale v. DMV Bars Refusal Suspensions

Beale v. DMV held that California cannot suspend a driver’s license for chemical-test refusal arising from an electric-bicycle ride. Analysis of the ruling, controlling statutes, limits, and defense strategy.

Spread the love

Read More

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 363-3347 Contact Us