Speak with an expert today (424) 363-3347(For attorneys only)

The Challenges Of Hair Follicle Testing

The Challenges Of Hair Follicle Testing

Hair follicle testing has risen in use to over 200,000 drug tests per year in the U.S. This type of drug testing analyzes the hair shaft for drug metabolites, as opposed to analyzing bodily fluids such as urine or saliva which are used in most other types of drug testing. This results in a longer detection window because drug metabolites stay present in a person’s scalp for up to three months after drug use. In comparison, urine testing only has a detection window of around one week for most drugs, and 30 days for marijuana.

Who Uses Hair Follicle Testing?

About 84% of private employers conduct drug tests upon job application, and 39% of all jobs have random screenings throughout employment. The most likely industries to make use of pre-employment drug tests are:

  • Government
  • Healthcare
  • Private security
  • Construction
  • Education
  • Defense
  • Transportation

The legal industry has used hair follicle testing more and more frequently over the past few years, especially when court-ordered drug testing is required. Some cases which make use of this testing include:

  • Probation
  • Divorce
  • Child custody

The results of these cases are life-changing, so false-positives are of major concern. In an attempt to limit the number of false positives, hair follicle testing involves a two-step testing process. But is this enough?

The Problems With Hair Follicle Testing

There are three main challenges with hair follicle testing. When viewing the results of a hair test, it’s important to realize there are influencing factors on hair tests

1. Melanin Levels Affect Drug Binding

The amount of melanin and the chemical treatment in a person’s hair affect the hair’s ability to absorb drug metabolites.

Someone with higher melanin levels in the hair, especially with the subtype eumelanin, has better binding ability of cocaine and amphetamines – leading to discrepancies in the timing of drug use between them and someone with lighter hair.

Scientists have found that both ingested and external cocaine binds to the hair’s melanin, resulting in false positives for cocaine use from just being in an environment containing cocaine. If someone snorts cocaine, the “aerosolized powder” gets deposited on all nearby surfaces, including in a non-users hair. In current hair follicle testing methods, this is indistinguishable from actual drug use.

2. Exposure ≠ Use

Hair follicle testing will pick up on any level of exposure to a drug, even if the person did not take or use the drug themselves.

If someone is exposed to cocaine for example, the test will not be able to differentiate between this person and someone who has actually used the drug. This false positive is extremely damaging for this person’s future and at this point, it is also completely unavoidable.

3. Religious Challenges

Another potential issue with hair follicle testing is that certain religions forbid the cutting of your hair. In one particular case, four East Indian Sikh applicants requested religious accommodation in a charge filed with the EEOC, and they were denied even though other tests were available.

What Does This Mean For Future Testing?

There is no arguing with the fact that hair follicle testing is extremely effective in detecting drug use. The larger detection window, combined with how difficult it is to tamper with results, make it one of the most useful forms of drug test. But, because false positives as well as discrepancies between dark and light hair are so frequent, hair testing should not be used as an end all for employees or defendants.

The growing concern surrounding these challenges with hair testing highlights the need for flexibility when they are used, as well as the potential need for multiple tests before conclusions are drawn.

Spread the love

The National Black Lawyers

top 40 lawyers

civil trial law

Lawyers of Distinction

Recent Blog Articles

Riverside Cross-Examination of Okorie Okorocha

Judge: Thank you. Back on the record matter. Sir, you are still under oath. Okorie Okorocha: Yes, your honor. Judge: Ms. McCauley cross-examination? Prosecutor Ms. McCauley: Yes, your honor. Good afternoon, Mr. Okorocha. Expert Witness Okorie Okorocha: Good afternoon. Am I saying that correctly? Expert Witness Okorie Okorocha: Yes, you…

Spread the love

Read More

Simpson Rips Jones

Publishing Original Scientific Research In 1997, Dr. Simpson was searching the scientific literature on alcohol and discovered several irregularities in work by AW Jones. An article published by Jones and Neri [1] in 1991 stated that the experimental work was reported in an earlier article published by Kelly, Myrsten, Neri,…

Spread the love

Read More

Malibu Sniper Sentenced 119 Years for Killing Camping Father in Front of Kids  

Congratulations to Nick Okorocha for his success in obtaining many acquittals in an impossible trial. Spread the love

Spread the love

Read More

Speak with an expert today!

Contact the offices of Okorie Okorocha for professional and reliable advice which you can trust.

Call (424) 283-0029 Contact Us